Exploring teachers’ and students’ gender role bias and students’ confidence in STEM fields

被引:0
作者
Sarah Hand
Lindsay Rice
Eric Greenlee
机构
[1] University of North Carolina,Department of Psychological Sciences
[2] Texas Tech University,undefined
来源
Social Psychology of Education | 2017年 / 20卷
关键词
STEM education; Gender role stereotypes; Self-efficacy; Gender-balanced teaching;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is a shortfall of girls and women pursuing STEM disciplines, a deficit that may be partially attributed to subtle forms of bias that are tied to traditional gender role stereotypes. The current study examined these subtle biases in high school teachers and students in two ways: by asking teachers and students to attribute masculine and feminine traits to the typical scientist or humanities professional, and by inquiring about the academic performance assumed of boys and girls. In addition, students were surveyed about their own self-efficacy in math and science courses and gender-balanced teaching initiatives present in the classroom. Results showed that teachers and students exhibited subtle bias by attributing more masculine characteristics to a scientist and feminine characteristics to the humanities. Teachers and students also reported their belief that boys tend to perform better than girls in STEM disciplines. Finally, our results echoed previous literature examining self-efficacy discrepancies for girls in math and science classes, and indicated a lack of gender-balanced teaching initiatives in math and science classes. These results have broad implications for the lack of women in STEM disciplines, and they also reveal a potential means of classroom intervention to help counteract these subtle forms of bias.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 945
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Beede D(2011)Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief 4 1-11
  • [2] Julian T(2005)Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students Understanding Teacher Quality 95 152-157
  • [3] Langdon D(2016)Stereotypes about gender and science women ≠ scientists Psychology of Women Quarterly 40 244-260
  • [4] McKitrick G(2002)Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education American Sociological Review 67 573-599
  • [5] Khan B(2009)Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries American Journal of Sociology 114 924-976
  • [6] Doms M(1993)What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications Psychometrika 16 297-334
  • [7] Bettinger EP(2000)Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 1171-1188
  • [8] Long BT(2002)Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders Psychological Review 109 573-598
  • [9] Carli LL(1990)Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics Educational Studies in Mathematics 21 460-507
  • [10] Alawa L(2008)Gender differences in the high school and affective experiences of introductory college physics students The Physics Teacher 46 423-427