A comparative study on plant growth and root plasticity responses of two Brachiaria forage grasses grown in nutrient solution at low and high phosphorus supply

被引:0
作者
Anna E. Louw-Gaume
Idupulapati M. Rao
Alain J. Gaume
Emmanuel Frossard
机构
[1] ETH-Zurich,Institute of Plant Sciences
[2] International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT),undefined
[3] Syngenta Crop Protection,undefined
来源
Plant and Soil | 2010年 / 328卷
关键词
Adaptation; Growth rate; Lateral roots; Phosphorus; Plasticity; Tissue mass density;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Brachiaria forage grasses are widely used for livestock production in the tropics. Signalgrass (Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk, CIAT 606) is better adapted to low phosphorus (P) soils than ruzigrass (B. ruziziensis cv. Kennedy, CIAT 654), but the physiological basis of differences in low-P adaptation is unknown. We characterized morphological and physiological responses of signalgrass and ruzigrass to low P supply by growing both grasses for 30 days in nutrient solution with two levels of P supply using the hydroxyapatite pouch system. Ruzigrass produced more biomass at both levels of P supply whilst signalgrass appears to be a slower-growing grass. Both grasses increased biomass allocation to roots and had higher root acid phosphatase and phytase activities at low P supply. At low P supply, ruzigrass showed greater morphological plasticity as its leaf mass density and lateral root fraction increased. For signalgrass, morphological traits that are not responsive to variation in P supply might confer long-term ecological advantages contributing to its superior field persistence: greater shoot tissue mass density (dry matter content) might lower nutrient requirements while maintenance of lateral root growth might be important for nutrient acquisition in patchy soils. Physiological plasticity in nutrient partitioning between root classes was also evident for signalgrass as main roots had higher nutrient concentrations at high P supply. Our results highlight the importance of analyzing morphological and physiological trait profiles and determining the role of phenotypic plasticity to characterize differences in low-P adaptation between Brachiaria genotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 164
页数:9
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]  
Aerts R(2000)The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited. A re-evaluation of processes and patterns Adv Ecol Res 30 1-67
[2]  
Chapin FS(1993)A simple model to explain the dominance of low-productive perennials in nutrient-poor habitats Oikos 66 144-147
[3]  
Aerts R(1999)Root architecture and biomass allocation of three range grasses in response to nonuniform supply of nutrients and shoot defoliation New Phytol 143 373-385
[4]  
Van der Peijl MJ(1990)Size and morphology of root systems of perennial grasses from contrasting habitats as affected by nitrogen supply Plant Soil 129 291-299
[5]  
Arredondo JT(1980)The mineral nutrition of wild plants Annu Rev Ecolog Syst 11 233-260
[6]  
Johnson DA(1983)Adaptation of selected trees and grasses to low availability of phosphorus Plant Soil 72 283-287
[7]  
Boot RGA(1982)Mild phosphorus stress in barley and a related low-phosphorus adapted barley grass: phosphorus fractions and phosphate absorption in relation to growth Physiol Plant 54 309-317
[8]  
Mensink M(1987)Morphological plasticity and mineral nutrient capture in two herbaceous species of contrasted ecology New Phytol 107 403-414
[9]  
Chapin FS(2001)Compilation of simple spectrophotometric techniques for the determination of elements in nutrient solutions J Plant Nutr 24 75-86
[10]  
Chapin FS(1994)The role of acid phosphatases in plant phosphorus metabolism Physiol Plant 90 791-800