Long-term Results of a Primary End-to-end Anastomosis in Peroperative Detected Bile Duct Injury

被引:0
作者
P. R. de Reuver
O. R. C. Busch
E. A. Rauws
J. S. Lameris
Th. M. van Gulik
D. J. Gouma
机构
[1] Amsterdam Medical Center,Department of Surgery
[2] Academic Medical Center,Department of Gastroenterology
[3] Academic Medical Center,Department of Radiology
来源
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2007年 / 11卷
关键词
Cholecystectomy; Bile duct injury; End-to-end anastomosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The management of a bile duct injury detected during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still under discussion. An end-to-end anastomosis (with or without T-tube drainage) in peroperative detected bile duct injury has been reported to be associated with stricture formation of the anastomosis area and recurrent jaundice. Between 1991 and 2005, 56 of a total of 500 bile duct injury patients were referred for treating complications after a primary end-to-end anastomosis. After referral, 43 (77%) patients were initially treated endoscopically or by percutaneous transhepatic stent placement (n = 3; 5%). After a mean follow-up of 7 ± 3.3 years, 37 patients (66%) were successfully treated with dilatation and endoscopically placed stents. One patient died due to a treatment-related complication. A total of 18 patients (32%) underwent a hepaticojejunostomy. Postoperative complications occurred in three patients (5%) without hospital mortality. These data confirm that end-to-end anastomosis might be considered as a primary treatment for peroperative detected transection of the bile duct without extensive tissue loss. Complications (stricture or leakage) can be adequately managed by endoscopic or percutaneous drainage the majority of patients (66%) and reconstructive surgery after complicated end-to-end anastomosis is a procedure with relative low morbidity and no mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 302
页数:6
相关论文
共 131 条
  • [1] Boerma D(2001)Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis Ann Surg 234 750-757
  • [2] Rauws EA(2003)Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in Medicare beneficiaries JAMA 290 2168-2173
  • [3] Keulemans YC(1999)Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study Ann Surg 229 449-457
  • [4] Bergman JJ(2000)Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: myth or reality of the learning curve? Surg Endosc 14 608-611
  • [5] Obertop H(1998)Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The United States experience Surg Endosc 12 315-321
  • [6] Huibregtse K(2000)Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s Ann Surg 232 430-441
  • [7] Gouma DJ(2002)Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9 543-547
  • [8] Flum DR(2003)Bile duct injuries 12 years after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Gastrointest Surg 7 412-416
  • [9] Cheadle A(2000)The “hidden cystic duct” syndrome and the infundibular technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy—the danger of the false infundibulum J Am Coll Surg 191 661-667
  • [10] Prela C(2004)A new method of preventing bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy World J Gastroenterol 10 2916-2918