Interventions in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis of natural and quasi-experiments

被引:0
作者
Tong Xia
Fan Zhao
Roch A. Nianogo
机构
[1] University of California,Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health
[2] Los Angeles (UCLA),undefined
[3] California Center for Population Research (CCPR),undefined
来源
Clinical Hypertension | / 28卷
关键词
Hypertension; Non-randomized controlled trials as topic; Comparative effectiveness research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 245 条
[1]  
Lewington S(2016)The burden of hypertension and associated risk for cardiovascular mortality in China JAMA Intern Med 176 524-532
[2]  
Lacey B(2017)Recent development of risk-prediction models for incident hypertension: an updated systematic review PLoS One 12 e67-492
[3]  
Clarke R(2018)Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association Circulation. 137 151-158
[4]  
Guo Y(2010)Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 185-194
[5]  
Kong XL(2003)Screening for high blood pressure: a review of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force Am J Prev Med 25 463-469
[6]  
Yang L(2013)Self-measured blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ann Intern Med 159 279478-2726
[7]  
Sun D(2013)Are observational studies more informative than randomized controlled trials in hypertension? Pro side of the argument Hypertension. 62 2720-25
[8]  
Liu J(2014)Acupuncture for essential hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled clinical trials Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014 5-370
[9]  
Xiao L(2004)Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities JAMA. 291 351-56
[10]  
Liu Y(2018)Selecting and improving quasi-experimental designs in effectiveness and implementation research Annu Rev Public Health 39 39-252