Clearing obstructed totally implantable central venous access portsAn efficient protocol using a second needle

被引:0
作者
Sonia Muguet
Sébastien Couraud
Emilie Perrot
Isabelle Claer
Pierre Jean Souquet
机构
[1] Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud,Hospices Civils de Lyon
[2] Université Lyon 1,Faculté de médecine et de maïeutique Lyon Sud – Charles Mérieux
来源
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2012年 / 20卷
关键词
Cancer; Totally implantable central venous access port; Vascular access device; Port complication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Totally implantable central venous access ports (IVAPs) are frequently used in oncology to assure chemotherapy delivery and other tasks. Obstruction of IVAPs is rare, but when it does occur it may result in treatment delays and/or invasive surgery for the patient. An IVAP unblocking protocol was implemented by the nursing staff of our department. The protocol is based on a precise decision tree comprising several progressive steps: (1) needle exchange; (2) if no result is observed, placement of a second needle and reservoir flushing with normal saline; and (3) if no result is observed, use of urokinase in the two-needle system. During 1 year, all consecutive patients presenting an obstructed IVAP in our unit benefited from this protocol. Medical files were then retrospectively reviewed to look for complication and for factors associated with blocked IVAPs. A total of 12 patients were included. The rate of successful IVAP unblocking was 92% (n = 11/12). The only unblocking failure was due to a mechanical obstruction, i.e., a bent catheter. No local or general complications were reported immediately after the unblocking protocol or in the following month. In 83% of the cases, obstruction occurred during use of IVAPs. Mains treatments administered when obstruction occurred were mannitol 20% (25%) and perfusion completed but non-flushed (50%). In the remaining 17%, obstruction was present before any action (at needle insertion). With all due caution because of the retrospective nature of this study, the IVAP unblocking protocol presented here appears to be efficacious and safe, and thus can be recommend for clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:2859 / 2864
页数:5
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Galloway M(2010)Insertion and placement of central catheters in the oncology patient Semin Oncol Nurs 26 102-112
  • [2] Pardo I(2011)Central venous port placement: a comparison of axillary versus anterior chest wall placement Ann Surg Oncol 18 468-471
  • [3] Rager EL(1998)Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days Ann Oncol 9 767-773
  • [4] Bowling MW(1997)Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device Eur J Cancer 33 1190-1194
  • [5] Fajardo A(2004)Complications and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports J Vasc Access 5 174-178
  • [6] Clare S(2011)Principles of subcutaneous Port placement Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 14 198-203
  • [7] Goulet R(2011)Totally implantable venous access port systems and risk factors for complications: a one-year prospective study in a cancer centre Eur J Surg Oncol 37 913-918
  • [8] Biffi R(2010)Totally implantable port management: impact of positive pressure during needle withdrawal on catheter tip occlusion (an experimental study) J Vasc Access 11 46-51
  • [9] de Braud F(2006)Intraluminal instillation of urokinase and autologous plasma: a method to unblock occluded central venous ports BMC Cancer 24 103-535
  • [10] Orsi F(1995)Outcome of usage protocols on implantable devices Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 14 534-418