An analysis of potential investment returns of planted forests in South China

被引:0
作者
Pu Zhang
Youjun He
Yiming Feng
Rafael De La Torre
Hongyan Jia
Jixin Tang
Frederick Cubbage
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Forestry,Institute of Desertification Studies
[2] Chinese Academy of Forestry,Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information
[3] Arbor Gen,The Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry
[4] Chinese Academy of Forestry,The Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry
[5] Chinese Academy of Forestry,Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources
[6] North Carolina State University,undefined
来源
New Forests | 2019年 / 50卷
关键词
China; Planted forest; Economics; Investment returns;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Financial returns of forest plantations are an important concern around the world. In this research, we focused on South China’s timber investments, collected data from the Pingxiang, Guangxi Province, China, which is the demonstration zone of Fast-growing and High-yielding Timber Plantation Base Construction Program and National Timber Strategic Storage and Production Bases Construction Program, and used capital budgeting analysis method and sensitivity analysis to compare different scenarios of planted forest management. The results showed that excluding land costs, (1) the financial returns of Eucalyptus forest managed by small business were excellent, having an IRR of 28% per year and a LEV of $7555 per ha, but it had a high risk with fluctuations of cost, timber price and timber yield; (2) the results for the Experimental Center of Tropical Forests indicate that the Eucalyptus forest and Castanopsis hystrix forest returns were greater than those for Cunninghamia lanceolata forest and Pinus massoniana forest, with having IRRs of 24%, 21%, 13% and 10% per year respectively. The mixed planted forest of Castanopsis hystrix × Eucalyptus and Castanopsis hystrix × Pinus massoniana had the features of high profits and low risks; (3) the forest farmers had lower levels of returns for Eucalyptus forest management in South China, but were still in the middle rank of global comparisons. This study gave a view of China’s timber investment and provided more options of improving the economic returns of planted forest management to both small businesses and forest farmers in South China.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 968
页数:25
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Ainembabazi JH(2014)Do commercial forest plantations reduce pressure on natural forests? Evidence from forest policy reforms in Uganda For Policy Econ 40 48-56
[2]  
Angelsen A(2015)Market-oriented forestry in China promotes forestland productivity New For 46 1-6
[3]  
Bai G(2017)A simple intuitive NPV-IRR consistent ranking Q Rev Econ Finance 1 1-7
[4]  
Wang Y(2001)The confirmation of harvesting period and the analysis of economic effect on the productive and high-quality chinese fir plantation Sci Silvae Sin 31 47-51
[5]  
Dai L(2002)Rotation of For Res 15 394-398
[6]  
Liu S(2007) ×  New For 33 237-255
[7]  
Tang L(2010) plantation for pulp and paper Biomass Bioenergy 34 1667-1678
[8]  
Shao G(2014)Timber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 44 S7-403
[9]  
Ben-Horin M(2013)Global timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 20 394-198
[10]  
Kroll Y(2018)Global timber investments and trends, 2005-2011 J For Econ 20 181-551