Familial breast cancer: management of ‘lower risk’ referrals

被引:0
作者
D Young
L McLeish
F Sullivan
M Pitkethly
M Reis
D Goudie
H Vysny
G Ozakinci
M Steel
机构
[1] Tayside Breast Cancer Family Clinic,Community Health Sciences Division
[2] Ninewells Hospital and Medical School,undefined
[3] University of Dundee Medical School,undefined
[4] Bute Medical School,undefined
[5] University of St Andrews,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2006年 / 95卷
关键词
breast cancer; familial; clinical services; assessment; primary care;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Up to 40% of referrals from primary care to ‘breast cancer family clinics’ prove to be of women whose assessed risk falls below the guidelines' threshold for management in secondary or tertiary care, despite recommendations that they should be screened out at primary care level. A randomised trial, involving 87 such women referred to the Tayside Familial Breast Cancer Service compared two ways of communicating risk information, letter or personal interview. Both were found to be acceptable to referred women and to their family doctors, although the former expressed a slight preference for interview. Only four women returned to their family doctors with continuing concerns about breast cancer. Nevertheless, understanding of information provided by either route was unsatisfactory, with apparent confusion about both absolute and relative risks of breast cancer. Substantial minorities appear to believe that they are at no increased risk at all, or even below the population level of risk, while others remain convinced that their personal risk has been underestimated. Family history record forms, completed by the referred women, preferably with the assistance of relatives, are crucial to full assessment of familial risk but one quarter of women referred to the Tayside Familial Breast Cancer Service currently do not complete and return these forms ahead of their clinic appointment. Further collaboration between primary care and the Breast Cancer Family Service is required to improve provision for concerned women whose risks fall below the threshold for special surveillance and to maximise effective use of the family history record form.
引用
收藏
页码:974 / 978
页数:4
相关论文
共 173 条
[1]  
Bankhead C(2001)New developments in genetics – knowledge, attitudes and information needs of practice nurses Fam Pract 18 475-486
[2]  
Emery J(2000)Randomised trial of a specialist genetic service for familial breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 92 1345-1351
[3]  
Qureshi N(2004)Psychological impact of genetic counselling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Natl Cancer Inst 96 122-133
[4]  
Campbell H(2004)Impact of a cancer registry-based genealogy service to support clinical genetics services Fam Cancer 3 139-141
[5]  
Austoker J(2003)Referrals of patients with a family history of breast cancer from primary care to cancer genetics services in S E Scotland Br J Cancer 89 1650-1656
[6]  
Watson E(1997)Public records and recognition of genetic disease in Scotland Clin Genet 31 125-131
[7]  
Brain K(1999)The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress Br J Cancer 79 501-508
[8]  
Gray J(2000)Guidelines for a genetic risk-based approach to advising women with a family history of breast cancer J Med Genet 37 203-209
[9]  
Norman P(2002)Reactions of GPs to a triage-controlled referral system for cancer genetics Fam Pract 19 65-71
[10]  
France E(2000)Primary care physicians' knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer predisposition Ann Oncol 11 1131-1135