Performance-Based Reward Distribution Methods for Anonymous Decision-Making Groups

被引:0
|
作者
B. Gavish
J.H. Gerdes
J. Kalvenes
机构
[1] Southern Methodist University,Eugene J. and Ruth F. Constantin Distinguished Chair in Business, Edwin L. Cox School of Business
[2] University of California,Anderson Graduate School of Management
[3] Southern Methodist University,Cox School of business
来源
关键词
anonymous; encryption; equity-based; GDSS; group decision support; performance-based; rewards;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research has shown that both the support of anonymity and the use of appropriate incentives can lead to improved group performance. Anonymity enables a more open discussion resulting in a more critical analysis of a problem. Rewards can motivate individuals to cooperate, giving them the incentive to share valuable information with the group. Unfortunately, these two mechanisms are both dependent on the ability to identify the contributor. Anonymity hides the identity of the contributor, while the support of individualized, performance-based rewards requires the rewarding agent to be able to determine the identity of the contributor. This contradictory requirement has prevented the simultaneous used of anonymity and performance-based rewards in decision making. Using group decision support systems as a basis, this work identifies procedures to simultaneously support participant anonymity and performance-based rewards. Mechanisms based on public key encryption technologies are presented which make it possible to distribute individual rewards to anonymous contributors, guarantee that only the contributor can claim a reward for her contribution, verify that a reward has been distributed, and be able to deliver this reward in such a way that the identity of the anonymous contributor is protected. This is accomplished without the rewarding agent ever knowing the identity of the recipient.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 413
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Changed Decision-making and Reward Processes in Bipolar Disorder
    Klein, Friederike
    FORTSCHRITTE DER NEUROLOGIE PSYCHIATRIE, 2019, 87 (03) : 153 - 153
  • [42] Reward Processing and Decision-Making in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
    May, Casey L.
    Wisco, Blair E.
    BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2020, 51 (05) : 814 - 828
  • [43] Reward, value and decisions: Neural mechanisms of decision-making
    Newsome, William
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2006, 55 : S1 - S1
  • [44] Reward-driven decision-making impairments in schizophrenia
    Saperia, Sarah
    Da Silva, Susana
    Siddiqui, Ishraq
    Agid, Ofer
    Daskalakis, Z. Jeff
    Ravindran, Arun
    Voineskos, Aristotle N.
    Zakzanis, Konstantine K.
    Remington, Gary
    Foussias, George
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2019, 206 : 277 - 283
  • [45] Decision-Making, Sensitivity to Reward and Attrition in Weight Management
    Koritzky, Gilly
    Dieterle, Camille
    Rice, Chantelle
    Jordan, Katie
    Bechara, Antoine
    OBESITY, 2014, 22 (08) : 1904 - 1909
  • [46] Influence of Dopaminergically Mediated Reward on Somatosensory Decision-Making
    Pleger, Burkhard
    Ruff, Christian C.
    Blankenburg, Felix
    Kloeppel, Stefan
    Driver, Jon
    Dolan, Raymond J.
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2009, 7 (07):
  • [47] Designing reward and penalty scheme in performance-based regulation for electric distribution companies
    Simab, M.
    Alvehag, K.
    Soder, L.
    Haghifam, M. R.
    IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2012, 6 (09) : 893 - 901
  • [48] Toward a Mechanistic Account of Gender Differences in Reward-Based Decision-Making
    Byrne, Kaileigh A.
    Worthy, Darrell A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE PSYCHOLOGY AND ECONOMICS, 2016, 9 (3-4) : 157 - 168
  • [49] Congruence of Inherent and Acquired Values Facilitates Reward-Based Decision-Making
    Chien, Samson
    Wiehler, Antonius
    Spezio, Michael
    Glaescher, Jan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 36 (18): : 5003 - 5012
  • [50] Performance-based methods
    Abell, MT
    Kennedy, ER
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 68 (15) : A459 - A459