Performance-Based Reward Distribution Methods for Anonymous Decision-Making Groups

被引:0
|
作者
B. Gavish
J.H. Gerdes
J. Kalvenes
机构
[1] Southern Methodist University,Eugene J. and Ruth F. Constantin Distinguished Chair in Business, Edwin L. Cox School of Business
[2] University of California,Anderson Graduate School of Management
[3] Southern Methodist University,Cox School of business
来源
关键词
anonymous; encryption; equity-based; GDSS; group decision support; performance-based; rewards;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research has shown that both the support of anonymity and the use of appropriate incentives can lead to improved group performance. Anonymity enables a more open discussion resulting in a more critical analysis of a problem. Rewards can motivate individuals to cooperate, giving them the incentive to share valuable information with the group. Unfortunately, these two mechanisms are both dependent on the ability to identify the contributor. Anonymity hides the identity of the contributor, while the support of individualized, performance-based rewards requires the rewarding agent to be able to determine the identity of the contributor. This contradictory requirement has prevented the simultaneous used of anonymity and performance-based rewards in decision making. Using group decision support systems as a basis, this work identifies procedures to simultaneously support participant anonymity and performance-based rewards. Mechanisms based on public key encryption technologies are presented which make it possible to distribute individual rewards to anonymous contributors, guarantee that only the contributor can claim a reward for her contribution, verify that a reward has been distributed, and be able to deliver this reward in such a way that the identity of the anonymous contributor is protected. This is accomplished without the rewarding agent ever knowing the identity of the recipient.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 413
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decision-making methods based on hybrid mF models
    Akram, Muhammad
    Ali, Ghous
    Waseem, Neha
    Davvaz, Bijan
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 35 (03) : 3387 - 3403
  • [32] Study on Process Methods Decision-Making Based on GA
    Li, Baodong
    Sun, Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (ICMS2009), VOL 2, 2009, : 293 - 297
  • [33] AN ANALYSIS OF CONFLICT IN DECISION-MAKING GROUPS
    Guetzkow, Harold
    Gyr, John
    HUMAN RELATIONS, 1954, 7 (03) : 367 - 382
  • [34] TIME ALLOCATION IN DECISION-MAKING GROUPS
    LITTLEPAGE, GE
    POOLE, JR
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 1993, 8 (04): : 663 - 672
  • [35] VARIABLES INFLUENCING DECISION-MAKING IN GROUPS
    MORTON, RB
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1961, 16 (07) : 438 - 438
  • [36] The Value of Distrust in Computer-Based Decision-Making Groups
    Lowry, Paul Benjamin
    Giboney, Justin
    Schuetzler, Ryan
    Richardson, Jacob
    Gregory, Tom
    Romney, John
    Anderson, Bonnie
    43RD HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS SCIENCES VOLS 1-5 (HICSS 2010), 2010, : 365 - 374
  • [37] UNDERSTANDING OUR DIFFERENCES - PERFORMANCE IN DECISION-MAKING GROUPS WITH DIVERSE MEMBERS
    MAZNEVSKI, ML
    HUMAN RELATIONS, 1994, 47 (05) : 531 - 552
  • [38] Multicultural groups in decision-making meetings Language proficiency and group performance
    Aritz, Jolanta
    Walker, Robyn C.
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNICATION, 2010, 20 (02) : 307 - 321
  • [39] Reward and Probability: Characterizing Decision-Making in Situations with Risk
    Sharp, Madeleine E.
    Lanyon, Linda J.
    Viswanathan, Jayalashmi J.
    Barton, Jason J. S.
    NEUROLOGY, 2011, 76 (09) : A80 - A80
  • [40] Neural circuitry of reward and decision-making process in humans
    Breiter, H
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 53 (08) : 101S - 101S