Performance-Based Reward Distribution Methods for Anonymous Decision-Making Groups

被引:0
|
作者
B. Gavish
J.H. Gerdes
J. Kalvenes
机构
[1] Southern Methodist University,Eugene J. and Ruth F. Constantin Distinguished Chair in Business, Edwin L. Cox School of Business
[2] University of California,Anderson Graduate School of Management
[3] Southern Methodist University,Cox School of business
来源
关键词
anonymous; encryption; equity-based; GDSS; group decision support; performance-based; rewards;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research has shown that both the support of anonymity and the use of appropriate incentives can lead to improved group performance. Anonymity enables a more open discussion resulting in a more critical analysis of a problem. Rewards can motivate individuals to cooperate, giving them the incentive to share valuable information with the group. Unfortunately, these two mechanisms are both dependent on the ability to identify the contributor. Anonymity hides the identity of the contributor, while the support of individualized, performance-based rewards requires the rewarding agent to be able to determine the identity of the contributor. This contradictory requirement has prevented the simultaneous used of anonymity and performance-based rewards in decision making. Using group decision support systems as a basis, this work identifies procedures to simultaneously support participant anonymity and performance-based rewards. Mechanisms based on public key encryption technologies are presented which make it possible to distribute individual rewards to anonymous contributors, guarantee that only the contributor can claim a reward for her contribution, verify that a reward has been distributed, and be able to deliver this reward in such a way that the identity of the anonymous contributor is protected. This is accomplished without the rewarding agent ever knowing the identity of the recipient.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 413
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Role of the Striatum in Effort-Based Decision-Making in the Absence of Reward
    Schouppe, Nathalie
    Demanet, Jelle
    Boehler, Carsten N.
    Ridderinkhof, K. Richard
    Notebaert, Wim
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 34 (06): : 2148 - 2154
  • [22] Reward Learning and Value-Based Decision-Making in Suicidal Behavior
    Dombrovski, Alexandre Y.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 69 (09) : 10S - 11S
  • [23] A performance-based design framework for enhancing decision-making at the conceptual phase of a motorcycle rear suspension development
    Corbera Caraballo, Sergio
    Alvarez Fernandez, Roberto
    OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 21 (04) : 1283 - 1317
  • [24] Performance-based multicriteria decision making for complex systems: An example
    Reneke, JA
    Wiecek, MM
    6TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL XVIII, PROCEEDINGS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS, CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS OF SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, 2002, : 292 - 298
  • [25] A performance-based design framework for enhancing decision-making at the conceptual phase of a motorcycle rear suspension development
    Sergio Corbera Caraballo
    Roberto Alvarez Fernandez
    Optimization and Engineering, 2020, 21 : 1283 - 1317
  • [26] The possibility of Paretian anonymous decision-making with an infinite population
    Susumu Cato
    Social Choice and Welfare, 2019, 53 : 587 - 601
  • [28] METHODS FOR MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
    HOLMESROVNER, M
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1992, 12 (03) : 159 - 162
  • [29] METHODS OF DECISION-MAKING IN DESIGNING
    LOWKA, D
    F&M-FEINWERKTECHNIK & MESSTECHNIK, 1975, 83 (01): : 19 - 21
  • [30] Decision-Making Methods of Condition-based Maintenance
    Zhang, Yaohui
    Han, Xiaohai
    Zhang, Shixin
    Wang, Shaohua
    2015 PROGNOSTICS AND SYSTEM HEALTH MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (PHM), 2015,