Effectiveness of friction pendulum system on the seismic behavior of high-rise building with shear wall

被引:0
作者
Agarwal A. [1 ]
Chatterjee S. [2 ]
Ram S. [1 ]
Singh D. [1 ]
Ralli R. [1 ]
Sharma C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Gautam Buddha University, Uttar Pradesh, Greater Noida
[2] Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi
关键词
Base isolation; Fling step; Forward directivity; Friction pendulum system; Near-fault earthquake; SAP; 2000; Shear wall;
D O I
10.1007/s42107-023-00618-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Building damage during an earthquake can be avoided or minimized by using a technique called base isolation. According to the present design methodology, flexible supports which are also known as isolators are positioned beneath each of the structure’s supporting points, which are typically found between the foundation and the main structure. The friction pendulum system (FPS) is a sort of base isolation system making use of a pendulum’s features to extend the isolated structure’s natural period and shield it from the highest earthquake effects. In this type of bearing, the superstructure is separated from the base utilizing concave surfaces and bearings that were specifically engineered to let sway during its own natural time during seismic events. In high-rise buildings, shear walls are the most popular lateral load-resisting technique. They feature great plane stiffness and strength, allowing them to withstand huge horizontal loads while supporting gravity loads at the same time. For a high-rise building, the seismic reaction of the friction pendulum system is compared to the response of the traditional method (shear wall system) and conventional building. To achieve this goal, SAP 2000 v16.0.0 is used to perform a non-linear time history analysis using the four near-fault earthquake records for a G+20-storey reinforced concrete high-rise building in forward directivity and fling step. Parameters used for the comparison are peak top floor displacement and peak top floor absolute acceleration. A significant reduction in displacement and acceleration values can be seen for the third model which includes shear wall and FPS. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:2719 / 2726
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Belgaonkar S.L., Amarnath A., Bevinakatti S.B., Pise N., Auti K., Effectiveness of shear wall orientation in RC framedstructures under the actionof seismic forces, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 7, 3, pp. 99-104, (2017)
  • [2] Bhandari M., Bharti S.D., Shrimali M.K., Datta T.K., The numerical study of base-isolated buildings under near-field and far-field earthquakes the numerical study of base-isolated buildings under near-field and far-field earthquakes, Journal of Earthuake Engineering, 22, 6, pp. 989-1007, (2017)
  • [3] Farzam M.F., Kaveh A., Optimum design of tuned mass dampers using colliding bodies optimization in frequency domain, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 44, pp. 787-802, (2020)
  • [4] Guo L., Rong Q., Ma X., Zhang S., Behavior of steel plate shear wall connected to frame beams only, International Journal of Steel Structures, 11, 4, pp. 467-479, (2011)
  • [5] Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic forces—code of Practice, (2003)
  • [6] Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1: General provisions and buildings (sixth revision), (2016)
  • [7] Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete—code of practice (fourth revision), (2016)
  • [8] Code of practice for code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures, part 1: Dead loads- unit weights of building materials and stored materials (second revision), (1987)
  • [9] Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures, part 2: Imposed loads (second revision), (1987)
  • [10] Jangid R.S., Optimum friction pendulum system for near-fault motions, Engineering Structures, 27, 3, pp. 349-359, (2005)