Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) with AO dynamic condylar screws (DCS) for the treatment for unstable peritrochanteric femoral fractures

被引：63

作者：

Şahin E.K. ^{[1
]}

İmerci A. ^{[1
]}

Kınık H. ^{[2
]}

Karapınar L. ^{[3
]}

Canbek U. ^{[4
]}

Savran A. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Erzurum Palandoken State Hospital, Yakutiye, Erzurum 25100, Asagi Kosk Mah.

[2] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Mesa Koru Sitesi, Cayyolu, Ankara

[3] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital

[4] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University School of Medicine, Mugla

来源：

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | 2014年 / 24卷 / 3期

关键词：

Dynamic condylar screws; Extramedullary fixation; Intramedullary fixation; Peritrochanteric fractures; Proximal femoral nail antirotation;

D O I：

10.1007/s00590-013-1195-0

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the results of intramedullary fixation with those of plate-screw fixation for peritrochanteric femoral fracture patients older than 60 years old. Methods: This article reports on a retrospective review of patients who had peritrochanteric femoral fractures and were treated with a 95° fixed-angle screw plate (DCS) or an intramedullary nailing system (PFNA). Patients with 79 fractures were enrolled in the study; 47 of them were treated with the PFNA system and 37 with the DCS. Followed for at least 1 year, the treatment groups were compared by taking into consideration all demographic and trauma variables. Results: No significant differences were discovered between the two groups with regard to side of injury, mechanism of trauma, associated comorbidities, AO fracture classification, average follow-up duration, mortality, and fracture reduction quality at the 1-year follow-up. The average surgical time was significantly lower in the PFNA group (57 min.) compared to the DCS group (87 min.). Longer operative time was needed in the DCS group, and thus, greater blood loss occurred compared to the PFNA group. The functional results of the PFNA group were found to be significantly better than those of the DCS group. Conclusions: Owing to some advantages, such as minimal exposure, reduced operative blood loss, and the achievement of biological fixation, PFNA is a better choice for the treatment for unstable peritrochanteric fractures. © 2013 The Author(s).

引用

页码：347 / 352

页数：5

共 32 条

[1]

Xu Y.Z., Geng D.C., Mao H.Q., Zhu X.S., Yang H.L., A comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation device and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fracture, J Int Med Res, 38, 4, pp. 1266-1275, (2010)

[2]

Akinci O., Akalin Y., Reisoglu A., Kayali C., Comparison of long-term results of dynamic hip screw and AO 130 degrees blade plate in adult trochanteric region fractures, Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 44, 6, pp. 443-451, (2010)

[3]

Pu J.S., Liu L., Wang G.L., Fang Y., Yang T.F., Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients, Int Orthop, 33, 5, pp. 1441-1444, (2009)

[4]

Jones H.W., Johnston P., Parker M., Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3, 279 fractures, Int Orthop, 30, pp. 69-78, (2006)

[5]

Utrilla A.L., Reig J.S., Munoz F.M., Tufanisco C.B., Trochanteric Gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: A randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the Gamma nail, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 19, 4, pp. 229-233, (2005)

[6]

Zeng C., Wang Y.R., Wei J., Gao S.G., Zhang F.J., Sun Z.Q., Lei G.H., Treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation or dynamic hip screw systems: A meta-analysis, J Int Med Res, 40, 3, pp. 839-851, (2012)

[7]

Zou J., Xu Y., Yang H., A comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw devices in trochanteric fractures, J Int Med Res, 37, 4, pp. 1057-1064, (2009)

[8]

Garg B., Marimuthu K., Kumar V., Malhotra R., Kotwal P.P., Outcome of short proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw for fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures. A randomised prospective comparative trial, Hip Int, 21, 5, pp. 531-536, (2011)

[9]

Saarenpaa I., Heikkinen T., Ristiniemi J., Hyvonen P., Leppilahti J., Jalovaara P., Functional comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail in trochanteric hip fractures: A matched-pair study of 268 patients, Int Orthop, 33, 1, pp. 255-260, (2009)

[10]

Leading the Way to Optimal Stability: Synthes. Original Instruments and Implants of the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation, pp. 1-44, (2004)

← 1 2 3 4 →