共 117 条
[1]
Bailit J(2003)Comparison of risk-adjustment methodologies Obstet Gynecol 102 45-51
[2]
Garrett J(2004)Stability of risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates over time Am J Obstet Gynecol 190 395-400
[3]
Bailit JL(2013)Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 27 297-308
[4]
Joanne M(2004)Cesarean delivery rates and neonatal morbidity in a low-risk population Obstet Gynecol 104 11-9
[5]
Garrett JM(2002)Hospital primary cesarean delivery rates and the risk of poor neonatal outcomes Am J Obstet Gynecol 187 721-7
[6]
Robson M(2006)Quality of obstetric care and risk-adjusted primary caesarean delivery rates Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 402-7
[7]
Hartigan L(2010)Evaluating risk-adjusted caesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality Obstet Gynecol 115 1007-13
[8]
Murphy M(2010)Quality in obstetric care: measuring what matters Obstet Gynecol 116 728-32
[9]
Gould JB(1996)Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second caesarean section N Engl J Med 335 689-95
[10]
Danielsen B(1999)Prediction of perinatal outcome in fetuses suspected to have intrauterine growth restriction: Doppler US study of fetal cerebral, renal, and umbilical arteries Radiology 213 681-9