Early Childhood Teachers’ Pedagogical Reasoning About How Children Learn During Language and Literacy Instruction

被引:0
作者
Schachter R.E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Child, Youth and Family Studies, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
关键词
Early childhood education; Knowledge for teaching; Language and literacy instruction; Pedagogical reasoning; Phenomenology; Stimulated recall interviews;
D O I
10.1007/s13158-017-0179-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The knowledge that teachers hold about children’s learning is important to teachers’ practice. Few studies have examined how early childhood teachers use such knowledge during moment-to-moment instruction for language and literacy learning. This study employed a phenomenological approach to understand the knowledge that eight early childhood teachers used to inform their pedagogical reasoning during language and literacy activities. Stimulated recall interviews about practice were conducted with the prekindergarten teachers. Results indicated that the teachers used multiple sources of knowledge to inform their pedagogical reasoning that included: conceptions about how children learn; knowledge about specific children and the learning goals for these children; factors related to the school context; and ideas about themselves as teachers. The analyses revealed that the teachers’ various sources of knowledge functioned together to influence their enacted practice. Implications for professional learning and policy are discussed. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 111
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ackerman D.J., Continuity of care, professional community, and the policy context: Potential benefits for infant and toddler teachers’ professional development, Early Education and Development, 19, pp. 753-772, (2008)
[2]  
Buysse V., Winton P.J., Rous B., Reaching consensus on a definition of professional development for the early childhood field, Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28, pp. 235-243, (2009)
[3]  
Cohen D.K., Raudenbush S.W., Ball D.L., Resources, instruction, and research, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, pp. 119-142, (2003)
[4]  
Cox M.E., Hollingsworth H., Buysse V., Exploring the professional development landscape: Summary from four states, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32, pp. 116-126, (2015)
[5]  
The Praxis Study Companion, (2015)
[6]  
Friesen A., Butera G., ‘You introduce all of the alphabet… But I do not think is should be the main focus’: Exploring early childhood educators’ decisions about reading instruction, Early Childhood Education Journal, 40, pp. 361-368, (2012)
[7]  
Fuligni A.S., Howes C., Huang Y., Hong S.S., Lara-Cinisomo S., Activity settings and daily routines in preschool classrooms: Diverse experiences in early learning settings for low-income children, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, pp. 198-202, (2012)
[8]  
Gatbonton E., ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge, Language Teaching Research, 12, pp. 161-182, (2008)
[9]  
Han M., Roskos K., Christie J., Mandzuk S., Vukelich C., Learning words: Large group time as a vocabulary development opportunity, Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 19, pp. 333-345, (2005)
[10]  
Happo I., Maatta K., Uusiatti S., How do early childhood education teachers perceive their expertise? A qualitative study of child care providers in Lapland, Finland, Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, pp. 273-281, (2013)