Carbon footprint associated with four disposal scenarios for urban pruning waste

被引:0
作者
Yuri Rommel Vieira Araújo
Monijany Lins de Góis
Luiz Moreira Coelho Junior
Monica Carvalho
机构
[1] Federal University of Paraíba—UFPB,Graduate Program in Renewable Energy, Center of Alternative and Renewable Energy
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2018年 / 25卷
关键词
Urban pruning waste; Disposal; Life cycle assessment; Incineration; Landfill; Carbon footprint;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The inadequate disposal of urban pruning residues can cause significant environmental impacts. The objective of the study presented herein was to quantify the carbon footprint and analyze four disposal scenarios for the urban pruning waste of the city of Joao Pessoa (Northeast Brazil). Software SimaPro was utilized for the quantification of the carbon footprint, with the IPCC 2013 GWP 100y impact evaluation method. The end-of-life treatments considered were sanitary landfilling (with and without collection of methane), simple municipal incineration, and reutilization of wood (transformation into briquettes). The results indicated that simple disposal in sanitary landfill generated 136.34 kg CO2/t urban pruning waste collected (highest carbon footprint), sanitary landfill with methane collection emitted 113.43 kg CO2/t waste, municipal incineration generated 71.31 kg CO2/t waste, and reutilization of woody residues was the scenario with the lowest carbon footprint, with 27.82 kg CO2/t waste. This study demonstrated that reutilization of biomass, besides being environmentally viable, presents the potential to contribute to the city’s environmental quality, including the possibility of being used to obtain carbon credits.
引用
收藏
页码:1863 / 1868
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Ariguchi BB(2015)Compost of garbage and tree pruning used as substrates for production of irrigated wild poinsettia seedling Afr J Agric Res 10 596-603
[2]  
Galbiatti JA(2015)Analysis of a CHP plant in a municipal solid waste landfill in the South of Spain Appl Therm Eng 91 706-717
[3]  
Rosa ART(2010)LCA comparison of windrow composting of yard wastes with use as alternative daily cover (ADC) Waste Manag 30 2649-2656
[4]  
Silva FG(2012)The critical review life cycle assessment studies according to ISO 14040 and 14044: origin, purpose and practical performance Int J Life Cycle Assess 17 1087-1093
[5]  
Faria RT(2014)What is “urban wood waste”? For Prod J 64 166-170
[6]  
Chacartegui R(2013)FORUM: challenges and future directions in urban afforestation J Appl Ecol 50 1169-1177
[7]  
Carvalho M(2014)Life cycle assessment and decision making in the integrated management and sustainability of urban solid residues Eng Sanit Ambient 119 301-313
[8]  
Abrahão R(2011)Management of urban solid waste: vermicomposting a sustainable option Resour Conserv Recycl 55 719-729
[9]  
Villanueva JAB(2010)Why are there so few afforestation and reforestation clean development mechanism projects? Land Use Policy 27 880-887
[10]  
Haaren RV(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined