The (missing) social aspect of the circular economy: a review of social scientific articles

被引:0
作者
Stylianos Zavos [1 ]
Taru Lehtokunnas [1 ]
Olli Pyyhtinen [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere University,Unit of Social Research, Faculty of Social Sciences
来源
Sustainable Earth Reviews | / 7卷 / 1期
关键词
Circular economy; Literature review; Social sciences; Waste;
D O I
10.1186/s42055-024-00083-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Academic research on the Circular Economy has been proliferating at an unprecedented pace during the last decade. However, scholarly work on the topic is dominated by a focus on hard scientific, technical and corporate/business management approaches, leaving the social sciences underrepresented in the relevant literature. This review article covers the current Anglophone social scientific research on the circular economy with special attention to waste. A total of 161 works aligning with the scope of this article were examined. These works were analysed in light of two questions: the reviewed studies’ knowledge interest and the dimension(s) of the CE they gave emphasis to. In result, the articles were charted along two axes: Instrumental/Technical (Quadrant I), Analytical/Technical (Quadrant II), Instrumental/Social (Quadrant III), and Analytical/Social (Quadrant IV). The findings of this review article demonstrate a strong thematic interest related to the circular economy in global, major issues of governance; transition and implementation; consumption and consumer behaviour; as well as the associated logic, concepts and definitions. A weaker thematic interest appeared in relation to the cultural, political and ethical dimensions of the circular economy, while critical engagements with and contestations of the model remain fairly rare. Moreover, the analysis revealed the relative absence of detailed empirical scholarship on the more-than-human relations and the micro-level, local everyday practices through which the circular economy becomes actualised. This review calls for the proliferation of such works currently situated in the margins of the circular economy literature. However, as is finally proposed, a balanced mapping of a circular economy transition would require an approach that would problematise levels, scales and dichotomies like ‘global’ and ‘local’ as categorical givens.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 420 条
  • [1] Havlicek J(1969)“Solid Wastes” – a resource? Am J Agr Econ 1 1598-602
  • [2] Tolley JR(1974)The economics of resource recovery from municipal solid waste Science 4129 1052-58
  • [3] Wang Y(1975)Cost/benefits of solid waste reuse Environ Sci Technol 9 423-27
  • [4] Abert JG(1977)Recovery of energy and other resources from solid waste — an economic systems evaluation Eng Process Econ 1 27-43
  • [5] Alter H(1978)The economics of resource recovery from solid waste Eng Process Econ 1 35-59
  • [6] Bernheisel JF(2018)Circular economy: the concept and its limitations Ecol Econ 143 37-46
  • [7] Schulz HW(2018)Circular economy as an essentially contested concept J Clean Prod 175 544-52
  • [8] Stuckenbruck LC(2017)The emergence of circular economy: a new framing around prolonging resource productivity J Ind Ecol 21 603-14
  • [9] King CF(2006)The circular economy – a new development strategy in China J Ind Ecol 1–2 4-8
  • [10] Wilson DC(2008)Developing the circular economy in China: challenges and opportunities for achieving ‘leapfrog development’ Int J Sust Dev World 15 231-39