Gestational age at birth and risk of intellectual disability without a common genetic cause

被引:0
|
作者
Hein Heuvelman
Kathryn Abel
Susanne Wicks
Renee Gardner
Edward Johnstone
Brian Lee
Cecilia Magnusson
Christina Dalman
Dheeraj Rai
机构
[1] University of Bristol,Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School
[2] University of Manchester,Centre for Women’s Mental Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Institute of Brain Behaviour and Mental Health
[3] Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust,Department of Public Health Sciences
[4] Karolinska Institutet,Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine
[5] Stockholm County Council,Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Institute for Human Development
[6] University of Manchester,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, A.J. Drexel Autism Institute
[7] St Mary’s Hospital,undefined
[8] Drexel University School of Public Health,undefined
[9] Avon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust,undefined
来源
European Journal of Epidemiology | 2018年 / 33卷
关键词
Intellectual disability; Gestational age; Stockholm Youth Cohort; Regression splines; Siblings; Post-term birth;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Preterm birth is linked to intellectual disability and there is evidence to suggest post-term birth may also incur risk. However, these associations have not yet been investigated in the absence of common genetic causes of intellectual disability, where risk associated with late delivery may be preventable. We therefore aimed to examine risk of intellectual disability without a common genetic cause across the entire range of gestation, using a matched-sibling design to account for unmeasured confounding by shared familial factors. We conducted a population-based retrospective study using data from the Stockholm Youth Cohort (n = 499,621) and examined associations in a nested cohort of matched outcome-discordant siblings (n = 8034). Risk of intellectual disability was greatest among those born extremely early (adjusted OR24 weeks = 14.54 [95% CI 11.46–18.44]), lessening with advancing gestational age toward term (aOR32 weeks = 3.59 [3.22–4.01]; aOR37weeks = 1.50 [1.38–1.63]); aOR38 weeks = 1.26 [1.16–1.37]; aOR39 weeks = 1.10 [1.04–1.17]) and increasing with advancing gestational age post-term (aOR42 weeks = 1.16 [1.08–1.25]; aOR43 weeks = 1.41 [1.21–1.64]; aOR44 weeks = 1.71 [1.34–2.18]; aOR45 weeks = 2.07 [1.47–2.92]). Associations persisted in a cohort of matched siblings suggesting they were robust against confounding by shared familial traits. Risk of intellectual disability was greatest among children showing evidence of fetal growth restriction, especially when birth occurred before or after term. Birth at non-optimal gestational duration may be linked causally with greater risk of intellectual disability. The mechanisms underlying these associations need to be elucidated as they are relevant to clinical practice concerning elective delivery around term and mitigation of risk in post-term children.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 678
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gestational age at birth and risk of intellectual disability without a common genetic cause
    Heuvelman, Hein
    Abel, Kathryn
    Wicks, Susanne
    Gardner, Renee
    Johnstone, Edward
    Lee, Brian
    Magnusson, Cecilia
    Dalman, Christina
    Rai, Dheeraj
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 33 (07) : 667 - 678
  • [2] Risk of intellectual disability in children born appropriate-for-gestational-age at term or post-term: impact of birth weight for gestational age and gestational age
    Chen, Ruoqing
    Tedroff, Kristina
    Villamor, Eduardo
    Lu, Donghao
    Cnattingius, Sven
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (03) : 273 - 282
  • [3] Risk of intellectual disability in children born appropriate-for-gestational-age at term or post-term: impact of birth weight for gestational age and gestational age
    Ruoqing Chen
    Kristina Tedroff
    Eduardo Villamor
    Donghao Lu
    Sven Cnattingius
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2020, 35 : 273 - 282
  • [4] Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders with and without Intellectual Disability by Gestational Age at Birth in the Stockholm Youth Cohort: a Register Linkage Study
    Xie, Sherlly
    Heuvelman, Hein
    Magnusson, Cecilia
    Rai, Dheeraj
    Lyall, Kristen
    Newschaffer, Craig J.
    Dalman, Christina
    Lee, Brian K.
    Abel, Kathryn
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 31 (06) : 586 - 594
  • [5] Risk for Developmental Coordination Disorder Correlates with Gestational Age at Birth
    Zhu, Jin Liang
    Olsen, Jorn
    Olesen, Annette W.
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 26 (06) : 572 - 577
  • [6] Birth weight, gestational age and weight for gestational age and the risk of Bipolar Disorder
    Chudal, Roshan
    Polo-Kantola, Paivi
    Gissler, Mika
    Lehti, Venla
    Hinkka-Yli-Salomaki, Susanna
    Sucksdorff, Dan
    Huttunen, Jukka
    Ristkari, Terja
    Brown, Alan S.
    Sourander, Andre
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 22 : S217 - S218
  • [7] Preterm birth and weight-for-gestational age for risks of autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability: A nationwide population-based cohort study
    Chang, Yu -Shan
    Chen, Li -Wen
    Yu, Tsung
    Lin, Sheng-Hsiang
    Kuo, Pao-Lin
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 122 (06) : 493 - 504
  • [8] Newborns of mothers with intellectual disability have a higher risk of perinatal death and being small for gestational age
    Hoglund, Berit
    Lindgren, Peter
    Larsson, Margareta
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 (12) : 1409 - 1414
  • [9] Gestational age at birth and risk of testicular cancer
    Crump, Casey
    Sundquist, Kristina
    Winkleby, Marilyn A.
    Sieh, Weiva
    Sundquist, Jan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 131 (02) : 446 - 451
  • [10] Women with intellectual disability at risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes
    McConnell, D.
    Mayes, R.
    Llewellyn, G.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2008, 52 : 529 - 535