Is sequence heterochrony an important evolutionary mechanism in mammals?

被引:52
作者
Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds
Jonathan E. Jeffrey
Michael K. Richardson
机构
[1] Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden
[2] Lehrstuhl für Tierzucht, Technical University of Munich
关键词
Development; Eutheria; Event-pair; Event-pair cracking; Heterochrony; Mammalia;
D O I
10.1023/B:JOMM.0000019775.39109.d2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is postulated widely that changes in developmental timing (i.e., heterochrony) represent a major mechanism of evolutionary change. However, it is only with recent methodological advances that changes in the order in which development proceeds (sequence heterochrony) can be identified and quantified. We apply these techniques to examine whether heterochrony in the early embryonic (organogenetic) period has played an important role in the diversification of mammals. Although we find clear instances of sequence heterochrony in mammals, particularly between eutherians and marsupials, the majority of mammalian lineages that we could examine (those within the major clades Euarchontoglires and Laurasiatheria) show few or no heterochronic changes in the 116 events examined (e.g., Artiodactyla, Euarchonta, Fereuungulata, Glires, Primates, Rodentia). This is in contrast with the timing shifts reported between and within other tetrapod clades. Our results suggest that sequence heterochrony in embryonic stages has not been a major feature of mammalian evolution. This might be because mammals, and perhaps amniotes in general, develop for an extended time in a protected environment, which could shield the embryos from strong diversifying selection. Our results are also consistent with the view that mammal embryos are subject to special developmental constraints. Therefore, other mechanisms explaining the diversity of extant mammals must be sought.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 361
页数:26
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Adams R.A., Stages of development and sequence of bone formation in the little brown bat, Myotis lucifigus, J. Mammal., 73, pp. 160-167, (1992)
  • [2] Alberch P., Problems with the interpretation of developmental sequences, Syst. Zool., 34, pp. 46-58, (1985)
  • [3] Alroy J., The fossil record of North American mammals: Evidence for a Paleocene evolutionary radiation, Syst. Biol., 48, pp. 107-118, (1999)
  • [4] Amrine-Madsen H., Koepfli K.P., Wayne R.K., Springer M.S., A new phylogenetic marker, apolipoprotein B, provides compelling evidence for eutherian relationships, Mol. Phylogenet. E, 28, pp. 225-240, (2003)
  • [5] Bard J.B.L., A unity underlying the different zebra striping patterns, J. Zool., 183, pp. 527-539, (1977)
  • [6] Bininda-Emonds O.R.P., Jeffery J.E., Coates M.I., Richardson M.K., From Haeckel to event-pairing: The evolution of developmental sequences, Theory Biosci., 121, pp. 297-320, (2002)
  • [7] Bryden M.M., Evans H.E., Binns W., Embryology of the sheep. I. Extraembryonic membranes and the development of body form, J. Morphol., 138, pp. 169-186, (1972)
  • [8] Cornell P.S., Complete mitochondrial genomes and eutherian evolution, J. Mammal. E, 9, pp. 281-305, (2002)
  • [9] Jong W.W., Van Dijk M.A., Poux C., Kappe G., Van Rheede T., Madsen O., Indels in protein-coding sequences of Euarchontoglires constrain the rooting of the eutherian tree, Mol. Phylogenet. E, 28, pp. 328-340, (2003)
  • [10] De Lange Jr. D., Nierstrasz H.F., Tabellarische Übersicht der Entwicklung Von Tupaia Javanica Horsf, (1932)