Toward a better understanding of team decision processes: combining laboratory experiments with agent-based modeling

被引:0
作者
Lorscheid I. [1 ]
Meyer M. [2 ]
机构
[1] University of Europe for Applied Sciences, Museumstrasse 39, Hamburg
[2] Institute of Management Accounting and Simulation, Hamburg University of Technology, Am Schwarzenberg-Campus 4, Hamburg
关键词
Agent-based modeling; Cognition; Group processes; Laboratory experiment; Team decision; Zero-intelligence agents;
D O I
10.1007/s11573-021-01052-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite advances in the field, we still know little about the socio-cognitive processes of team decisions, particularly their emergence from an individual level and transition to a team level. This study investigates team decision processes by using an agent-based model to conceptualize team decisions as an emergent property. It uses a mixed-method research design with a laboratory experiment providing qualitative and quantitative input for the model’s construction, as well as data for an output validation of the model. First, the laboratory experiment generates data about individual and team cognition structures. Then, the agent-based model is used as a computational testbed to contrast several processes of team decision making, representing potential, simplified mechanisms of how a team decision emerges. The increasing overall fit of the simulation and empirical results indicates that the modeled decision processes can at least partly explain the observed team decisions. Overall, we contribute to the current literature by presenting an innovative mixed-method approach that opens and exposes the black box of team decision processes beyond well-known static attributes. © 2021, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:1431 / 1467
页数:36
相关论文
共 58 条
[41]  
Miller D.L., The stages of group development: a retrospective study of dynamic team processes, Can J Adm Sci, 20, 2, pp. 121-134, (2003)
[42]  
Moreland R.L., Myaskovsky L., Exploring the performance benefits of group training: transactive memory or improved communication?, Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 82, 1, pp. 117-133, (2000)
[43]  
Railsback S.F., Grimm V., Agent-based and individual-based modeling: a practical introduction, (2012)
[44]  
Reader T.W., Team decision making. The wiley blackwell handbook of the psychology of team working and collaborative processes, pp. 271-296, (2017)
[45]  
Rousseau V., Aube C., Savoie A., Teamwork behaviors: a review and an integration of frameworks, Small Group Res, 37, 5, pp. 540-570, (2006)
[46]  
Schulz-Hardt S., Jochims M., Frey D., Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking, Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 88, 2, pp. 563-586, (2002)
[47]  
Secchi D., A case for agent-based models in organizational behavior and team research, Team Perform Manag Internat J, 21, 1-2, pp. 37-50, (2015)
[48]  
Secchi D., Seri R., Controlling for false negatives in agent-based models: a review of power analysis in organizational research, Comput Math Organ Theory, 23, 1, pp. 94-121, (2016)
[49]  
Singh V., Singh G., Pande S., Emergence, self-organization and collective intelligence -- modeling the dynamics of complex collectives in social and organizational settings, Uksim 15Th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation. IEEE, pp. 182-189, (2013)
[50]  
Smaldino P.E., Calanchini J., Pickett C.L., Theory development with agent-based models, Organ Psychol Rev, 5, 4, pp. 300-317, (2015)