Toward a better understanding of team decision processes: combining laboratory experiments with agent-based modeling

被引:0
作者
Lorscheid I. [1 ]
Meyer M. [2 ]
机构
[1] University of Europe for Applied Sciences, Museumstrasse 39, Hamburg
[2] Institute of Management Accounting and Simulation, Hamburg University of Technology, Am Schwarzenberg-Campus 4, Hamburg
关键词
Agent-based modeling; Cognition; Group processes; Laboratory experiment; Team decision; Zero-intelligence agents;
D O I
10.1007/s11573-021-01052-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite advances in the field, we still know little about the socio-cognitive processes of team decisions, particularly their emergence from an individual level and transition to a team level. This study investigates team decision processes by using an agent-based model to conceptualize team decisions as an emergent property. It uses a mixed-method research design with a laboratory experiment providing qualitative and quantitative input for the model’s construction, as well as data for an output validation of the model. First, the laboratory experiment generates data about individual and team cognition structures. Then, the agent-based model is used as a computational testbed to contrast several processes of team decision making, representing potential, simplified mechanisms of how a team decision emerges. The increasing overall fit of the simulation and empirical results indicates that the modeled decision processes can at least partly explain the observed team decisions. Overall, we contribute to the current literature by presenting an innovative mixed-method approach that opens and exposes the black box of team decision processes beyond well-known static attributes. © 2021, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:1431 / 1467
页数:36
相关论文
共 58 条
[11]  
Engel D., Woolley A.W., Jing L.X., Chabris C.F., Malone T.W., Reading the mind in the eyes or reading between the lines? Theory of mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face, PLoS ONE, 9, 12, (2014)
[12]  
Esser J.K., Alive and well after 25 years: a review of groupthink research, Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 73, 2, pp. 116-141, (1998)
[13]  
Gode D.K., Sunder S., Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: market as a partial substitute for individual rationality, J Polit Econ, 101, 1, pp. 119-137, (1993)
[14]  
Gottfredson L.S., Mainstream science on intelligence: an editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography, Intelligence, 24, 1, pp. 13-23, (1997)
[15]  
Grand J.A., Braun M.T., Kuljanin G., Kozlowski S.W., Chao G.T., The dynamics of team cognition: a process-oriented theory of knowledge emergence in teams, J Appl Psychol, 101, 10, pp. 1353-1385, (2016)
[16]  
Grimm V., Railsback S.F., Pattern-oriented modelling: a ‘multi-scope’for predictive systems ecology, Philos Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sci, 367, 1586, pp. 298-310, (2012)
[17]  
Gutwin C., Greenberg S., The Importance of Awareness for Team Cognition in Distributed Collaboration, (2004)
[18]  
Hackman J.R., Morris C.G., Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: a review and proposed integration. In: advances in experimental social psychology, 8, pp. 45-99, (1975)
[19]  
Hauke J., Lorscheid I., Meyer M., Recent development of social simulation as reflected in JASSS between 2008 and 2014: a citation and co-citation analysis, J Artif Soc Soc Simul, 20, 1, (2017)
[20]  
Hauke J., Lorscheid I., Meyer M., Individuals and their interactions in demand planning processes: an agent-based, computational testbed, Int J Prod Res, 56, 13, pp. 4644-4658, (2018)