Toward a better understanding of team decision processes: combining laboratory experiments with agent-based modeling

被引:0
作者
Lorscheid I. [1 ]
Meyer M. [2 ]
机构
[1] University of Europe for Applied Sciences, Museumstrasse 39, Hamburg
[2] Institute of Management Accounting and Simulation, Hamburg University of Technology, Am Schwarzenberg-Campus 4, Hamburg
关键词
Agent-based modeling; Cognition; Group processes; Laboratory experiment; Team decision; Zero-intelligence agents;
D O I
10.1007/s11573-021-01052-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite advances in the field, we still know little about the socio-cognitive processes of team decisions, particularly their emergence from an individual level and transition to a team level. This study investigates team decision processes by using an agent-based model to conceptualize team decisions as an emergent property. It uses a mixed-method research design with a laboratory experiment providing qualitative and quantitative input for the model’s construction, as well as data for an output validation of the model. First, the laboratory experiment generates data about individual and team cognition structures. Then, the agent-based model is used as a computational testbed to contrast several processes of team decision making, representing potential, simplified mechanisms of how a team decision emerges. The increasing overall fit of the simulation and empirical results indicates that the modeled decision processes can at least partly explain the observed team decisions. Overall, we contribute to the current literature by presenting an innovative mixed-method approach that opens and exposes the black box of team decision processes beyond well-known static attributes. © 2021, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:1431 / 1467
页数:36
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Cohen S.G., Bailey D.E., What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite, J Manag, 23, 3, pp. 239-290, (1997)
[2]  
Cooke N.J., Team cognition as interaction, Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 24, 6, pp. 415-419, (2015)
[3]  
Cooke R.A., Kernaghan J.A., Estimating the difference between group versus individual performance on problem-solving tasks, Group Organ Studies, 12, 3, pp. 319-342, (1987)
[4]  
Cooke N.J., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J.A., Stout R.J., Measuring team knowledge, Hum Factors, 42, 1, pp. 151-173, (2000)
[5]  
Cooke N.J., Gorman J.C., Myers C.W., Duran J.L., Interactive team cognition, Cogn Sci, 37, 2, pp. 255-285, (2013)
[6]  
Crusius J., van Horen F., Mussweiler T., Why process matters: a social cognition perspective on economic behavior, J Econ Psychol, 33, 3, pp. 677-685, (2012)
[7]  
Deffuant G., Neau D., Amblard F., Weisbuch G., Mixing beliefs among interacting agents, Adv Complex Syst, 3, 4, pp. 87-98, (2000)
[8]  
Delgado P.M.I., Martinez A.M.R., Martinez L.G., Teams in organizations: a review on team effectiveness, Team Perform Manag Internat J, 14, 1-2, pp. 7-21, (2008)
[9]  
DeVilliers R., Woodside A.G., Marshall R., Making tough decisions competently: assessing the value of product portfolio planning methods, devil’s advocacy, group discussion, weighting priorities, and evidenced-based information, J Bus Res, 69, 8, pp. 2849-2862, (2016)
[10]  
Devine D.J., Philips J.L., Do smarter teams do better: a meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance, Small Group Res, 32, 5, pp. 507-532, (2001)