Roles of Flavor and Reward Intensities in Acquisition and Generalization of Food Preferences: Do Strong Plant Signals Always Deter Herbivory?

被引:0
作者
Juan J. Villalba
Frederick D. Provenza
机构
[1] Utah State University,Department of Rangeland Resources
[2] Utah State University,Department of Rangeland Resources
来源
Journal of Chemical Ecology | 2000年 / 26卷
关键词
Flavor; sheep; feeding preferences; herbivory; plant signals; generalization; foraging; diet selection; reward intensities; starch;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Plants possess a variety of flavor intensities and nutritional qualities that influence diet selection by herbivores. Some studies suggest that herbivores prefer less intense flavors, either in nutritious or toxic foods. However, if flavor preferences are learned, and if they are influenced by flavor-postingestive feedback interactions, then herbivores should form preferences for either weak or strong flavors when they are followed by greater nutrient rewards. We conditioned two groups of lambs with intraruminal infusions of 30 g of starch while they consumed onion-flavored straw at concentrations of 0.5% (group 1) or 4% (group 2). On alternate days, lambs received infusions of 150 g of starch while they consumed onion-flavored straw at concentrations of either 4% (group 1) or 0.5% (group 2). When offered a choice of straw in both flavor concentrations, lambs preferred the concentration—high or low—associated with the higher dose of starch during conditioning (P < 0.05). When offered a choice of onion-flavored straw in four concentrations (0.25, 1, 2, and 5%), lambs in group 1 preferred the highest onion concentration (5%), whereas lambs in group 2 preferred lower onion concentrations (0.25, 1, and 2%) (P < 0.001). the same pattern of preference was maintained when lambs had no food (day 1; no preload), or an energy(day 2; barley preload) or a protein-rich (day 3; alfalfa–soybean preload) meal before testing (P > 0.05). Lambs with no experience of onion or starch (inexperienced lambs) preferred 0.5% onion-flavored straw to 4% onion-flavored straw (P < 0.001), and 1 and 2% onion-flavored straw to 0.5% and 5% onion-flavored straw (P < 0.05). Thus, strong flavors were initially avoided (inexperienced lambs), but they came to be preferred after their association with higher doses of starch (group 1). Collectively, our results suggest that herbivores acquire and generalize preferences for flavor intensities as a function of their previous experience with the quantitative relationship between flavor intensity and nutrient reward. This ability is critical for survival because flavors, nutrients, and toxins all vary in concentrations in different plant species and parts, as well as temporally within a species.
引用
收藏
页码:1911 / 1922
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Augner M.(1998)Plant defence signals and Batesian mimicry Evol. Ecol. 12 667-679
[2]  
Bernays E. A.(1998)A rule of thumb in mammalian herbivores? Anim. Behav. 56 337-345
[3]  
Augner M.(1995)Qualitative and quantitative comparison of volatile sulphides and flavour precursors in different organs of some wild and cultivated garlics Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 23 787-791
[4]  
Provenza F. D.(1980)Toxicity, odor aversion, and “olfactory aposematism.” Science 213 476-50
[5]  
Villalba J. J.(1974)Taste salience depends on novelty, not concentration, in taste-aversion learning in the rat J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 86 47-504
[6]  
Bosher J.(1993)Can plants practice mimicry to avoid grazing by mammalian herbivores? Oikos 66 501-13
[7]  
Auger J.(1994)The effect of flavor concentration and toxin dose on the formation and generalization of flavor aversions in lambs J. Anim. Sci. 72 10-1056
[8]  
Mandon N.(1993)How herbivores track variable environments: Response to variability of phytotoxins J. Chem. Ecol. 19 1047-334
[9]  
Ferary S.(1997)Overcoming food neophobia in domestic ruminants through addition of a familiar flavor and repeated exposure to novel foods Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54 327-415
[10]  
Eisner T.(1999)An ecological example of conditioned flavor aversion in plant-herbivore interactions: the effect of terpenes of J. Chem. Ecol. 25 401-71