Quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT for the assessment of myocardial tracer uptake in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease: Initial experiences and results

[1] Rischpler C(2013)PET and SPECT in heart failure Curr Cardiol Rep 15 337-587

[2] Nekolla S(2014)Influence of SPECT attenuation correction on the quantification of hibernating myocardium as derived from combined myocardial perfusion SPECT and (1)(8)F-FDG PET J Nucl Cardiol 21 578-114

[3] Schwaiger M(2008)Stunning, hibernation, and assessment of myocardial viability Circulation 117 103-545

[4] Lehner S(2016)High-risk coronary artery disease, but normal myocardial perfusion: A matter of concern? J Nucl Cardiol 23 542-262

[5] Sussebach C(2019)Intra- and interobserver agreement of SUV SPECT quantitative SPECT/CT processing software, applied in clinical settings for patients with solid renal tumors J Nucl Med Technol 47 258-2153

[6] Todica A(2018)Experimental validation of absolute SPECT/CT quantification for response monitoring in breast cancer Med Phys 45 2143-89

[7] Uebleis C(2019)Quantitative bone SPECT/CT: high specificity for identification of prostate cancer bone metastases BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20 619-1363

[8] Brunner S(2013)An evidence-based review of quantitative SPECT imaging and potential clinical applications J Nucl Med 54 83-1743

[9] Bartenstein P(2019)Comparison of standardized uptake values between (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer EJNMMI Res 9 6-77

[10] Camici PG(2020)DPD quantification in cardiac amyloidosis: A novel imaging biomarker JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13 1353-5

[1] Rischpler C(2013)PET and SPECT in heart failure Curr Cardiol Rep 15 337-587

[2] Nekolla S(2014)Influence of SPECT attenuation correction on the quantification of hibernating myocardium as derived from combined myocardial perfusion SPECT and (1)(8)F-FDG PET J Nucl Cardiol 21 578-114

[3] Schwaiger M(2008)Stunning, hibernation, and assessment of myocardial viability Circulation 117 103-545

[4] Lehner S(2016)High-risk coronary artery disease, but normal myocardial perfusion: A matter of concern? J Nucl Cardiol 23 542-262

[5] Sussebach C(2019)Intra- and interobserver agreement of SUV SPECT quantitative SPECT/CT processing software, applied in clinical settings for patients with solid renal tumors J Nucl Med Technol 47 258-2153

[6] Todica A(2018)Experimental validation of absolute SPECT/CT quantification for response monitoring in breast cancer Med Phys 45 2143-89

[7] Uebleis C(2019)Quantitative bone SPECT/CT: high specificity for identification of prostate cancer bone metastases BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20 619-1363

[8] Brunner S(2013)An evidence-based review of quantitative SPECT imaging and potential clinical applications J Nucl Med 54 83-1743

[9] Bartenstein P(2019)Comparison of standardized uptake values between (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer EJNMMI Res 9 6-77

[10] Camici PG(2020)DPD quantification in cardiac amyloidosis: A novel imaging biomarker JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13 1353-5