ICT and Human Capital Spillover Effects in Achieving Sustainable East Asian Knowledge-Based Economies

被引:40
作者
Ahmed E.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Business, Economics Unit, Multimedia University, Melaka
关键词
East Asia; Human capital; ICT; K-economy; Spillover effects;
D O I
10.1007/s13132-016-0430-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study assesses the impact of information and communications technology (ICT) and human capital spillover effects on productivity on selected five countries of Association of Southeast Asian Nations, (ASEAN5), Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand, plus three East Asian Countries (China, Japan, and South Korea). The factors identified as inducing productivity of ASEAN-5 + 3 are the single contributions of physical capital, labor, ICT, human capital, and the instantaneous contribution of the quality of these factors. That is articulated as the total factor productivity (TFP). The study contributes to the knowledge by using three variations of extensive and intensive growth theories (such as output model, labor productivity, and capital productivity). In this respect, the results show that the productivity growth of ASEAN 5 is an input driven; however, China has overtaken the second largest economy position in the world and emerged as productivity-driven nation that attracted multination company investment. Meanwhile, Japan and South Korean model has constructed global companies that help them to join the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:1086 / 1112
页数:26
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [21] Easterly W., Review comments on six regional growth studies, Mimeo, (2000)
  • [22] Elsadig M.A., Carbon dioxide emissions, impact on Malaysia’s manufacturing productivity growth, World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 3, 1, pp. 58-69, (2006)
  • [23] Elsadig M.A., ICT and human capital role in achieving knowledge-based economy: applications on Malaysia’s manufacturing, Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 5, 2, pp. 1-12, (2006)
  • [24] Engle R.F., Granger C.W.J., Time-series econometrics: cointegration and autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Advanced information on the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, (2003)
  • [25] Evenson R.E., Putman J., Inter-sectoral technology flows: estimates from a patent concordance with an application to Italy, Unpublished Paper, (1993)
  • [26] Felipe J., On the myth and mystery of Singapore’s zero TFP, Asian Economic Journal, 14, 2, pp. 187-208, (2000)
  • [27] Gordon R.J., Does the ‘New Economy’ measure up to the great inventions of the past?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, Fall, pp. 49-74, (2000)
  • [28] Griliches Z., Jorgenson D.W., Capital theory: technical progress and capital structure, sources of measured productivity change capital input, American Economic Review, 56, 2, pp. 50-61, (1966)
  • [29] Grossman G., Helpman E., Innovation and growth in the global economy, (1991)
  • [30] Hoeffler A., The augmented Solow model and the African growth debate, (1999)