Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures—a systematic review

被引:0
作者
Åsa Nordin
Charles Taft
Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson
Anna Dencker
机构
[1] University of Gothenburg,Gothenburg Centre for Person
[2] University of Gothenburg,Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy
[3] University of Gothenburg,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy
来源
BMC Medical Research Methodology | / 16卷
关键词
MID; Fatigue; PROM; Minimal important difference; Systematic review; MCID; MCII;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 312 条
[1]  
Ream E(1996)Fatigue: a concept analysis Int J Nurs Stud 33 519-529
[2]  
Richardson A(1994)The impact of fatigue on patients with multiple sclerosis Canadian J Neurological Sciences 21 9-14
[3]  
Fisk JD(1993)A comparison of neuropsychiatric characteristics in chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and major depression J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 5 200-205
[4]  
Pontefract A(1994)Fatigue and the cancer experience: the state of the knowledge Oncol Nurs Forum 21 23-36
[5]  
Ritvo PG(1998)Fatigue--an orphan topic in patients with cancer? Eur J Cancer 34 1649-1651
[6]  
Archibald CJ(1994)Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome J Psychosom Res 38 383-392
[7]  
Murray TJ(2011)Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science BMC Med 9 86-128
[8]  
Pepper CM(2009)The measurement of fatigue in chronic illness: a systematic review of unidimensional and multidimensional fatigue measures J Pain Symptom Manage 37 107-546
[9]  
Krupp LB(2007)Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods Spine J 7 541-1133
[10]  
Friedberg F(2008)The clinical significance of statistical significance Oncologist 13 1129-518