The influence of chemically enhanced backwash by-products (CEBBPs) on water quality in the coagulation–ultrafiltration process

被引:0
作者
Yue Zhang
Xinhua Zhao
Xinbo Zhang
Jingmei Sun
机构
[1] Tianjin University,School of Environmental Science and Engineering
[2] Tianjin University,State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety
[3] Tianjin Chengjian University,School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2016年 / 23卷
关键词
Chemically enhanced blackwash (CEB); Chemically enhanced backwash by products (CEBBPs); Coagulation-ultrafiltration process; CEB cleaning parameters;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study was conducted to investigate the typical types of chemically enhanced backwash by-products (CEBBPs) produced in the chemically enhanced backwash (CEB) process and the influence of CEB parameters on typical CEBBPs in the coagulation–ultrafiltration process. Health risk assessment was applied to assess the potential adverse health effect from exposure to effluent after the optimal CEB. The results indicated that backwash reagent of sodium hypochlorite reacted with organic matter to produce CEBBPs, including 12 species of volatile halogenated organic compounds (VHOCs) and 9 species of haloacetic acids (HAAs) during CEB process. The amount of HAAs was higher than that of VHOCs indicating that the content of primary HAA precursor (hydrophilic organic matter) was high in raw surface water and the coagulation process could not lower the hydrophilic organic matter concentration. After comprehensive consideration of the influence of single factors on the CEBBP formation and membrane cleaning effect, the optimal CEB parameters was 4 min of backwash duration, 120 min of backwash interval, 20 L/(m2·h) of backwash flux, and 25 mg/L of reagent concentration. Under the optimum CEB cleaning parameters, the effluent did not pose non-carcinogenic risk to local residents but could pose potential carcinogenic risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1805 / 1819
页数:14
相关论文
共 99 条
[21]  
Dong B(2013)Comparison of approaches to minimize fouling of a UF ceramic membrane in filtration of seawater Chem Eng J 223 722-728
[22]  
Chu H(2007)Pilot testing of outside-in MF and UF modules used for cooling tower blowdown pretreatment of power plants Desalination 214 287-298
[23]  
Xu G(2015)The change of NOM in a submerged UF membrane with three different pretreatment processes compared to an individual UF membrane Desalination 360 118-129
[24]  
Yan Z(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[25]  
Jermann D(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[26]  
Pronk W(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[27]  
Meylan S(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[28]  
Boller M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[29]  
Kavcar P(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[30]  
Sofuoglu A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined