Comparative signaling generated for expository texts by 4th–8th graders: variations by text structure strategy instruction, comprehension skill, and signal word

被引:0
作者
Bonnie J. F. Meyer
Kausalai Wijekumar
Puiwa Lei
机构
[1] The Pennsylvania State University,College of Education and Human Development
[2] Texas A&M University,undefined
[3] The Pennsylvania State University,undefined
来源
Reading and Writing | 2018年 / 31卷
关键词
Signaling words; Rhetorical devices; Text structure strategy; Reading comprehension;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Explicit signals of important relationships in expository texts can provide efficient processing instructions for readers with strategic knowledge about text structures. However, such signal words do not help readers without strategic knowledge about use of text structures and signal words. This study provided the first detailed investigation about the effects of structure strategy instruction on understanding several types of comparative signal words in multi-paragraph expository texts. The study, set in 41 school districts, examined four comparative signal words generated by three groups of reading comprehenders in Grades 4, 5, 7, and 8 and how such understandings were impacted by instruction with the text structure strategy. Students in classrooms randomly assigned to structure strategy instruction showed more understanding of comparative signal words than those in the business as usual control. The intervention aided 4th, 5th, and 7th graders’ generation of all signal words, but more so for the more difficult signaling words that transitioned between paragraphs. For Grade 4 the intervention helped some reading comprehension groups more than others depending on signal word difficulty. For Grade 8 the intervention increased understanding of difficult signal words, but not the easiest signal word. Males in Grade 5 using the web-based structure strategy instruction improved their generation of the easiest signal word more than females, but females improved more on the difficult signal words. The comparison text structure and its signaling words appear ideal targets for instruction at upper elementary and middle school. The findings have implications for classroom instruction about text structures.
引用
收藏
页码:1937 / 1968
页数:31
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [1] Alexander PA(2005)The path to competence: A lifespan developmental perspective on reading Journal of Literacy Research 37 413-436
  • [2] Benjamini Y(1995)Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 57 289-300
  • [3] Hochberg Y(1990)Redundacy and the coherence cloze Journal of Research in Reading 13 18-37
  • [4] Bensoussan M(2014)The interplay of reader goals, working memory, and text structure during reading Contemporary Educational Psychology 39 206-219
  • [5] Bohn-Gettler CM(2011)The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text Journal of Educational Psychology 103 429-441
  • [6] Kendeou P(2017)That noun phrase may be beneficial and this may not be: Discourse cohesion in reading and writing Reading and Writing 30 569-589
  • [7] Cain K(2013)Does knowledge of connectives play a unique role in reading comprehension of English learners and English-only students? Journal of Research in Reading 36 241-260
  • [8] Nash HM(2016)The effects of text structure instruction on informational text comprehension: A meta-analysis Journal of Educational Psychology 108 609-629
  • [9] Crossley SA(2008)SARA: A text-based and reader-based theory of signaling Educational Psychologist 43 27-48
  • [10] Rose DF(2006)Resistance, struggle, and the adolescent reader Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 50 136-146