Economic value of traffic noise reduction depending on residents’ annoyance level

被引:0
作者
Kyungah Kim
Jungwoo Shin
Myoungjin Oh
Jung-Kyu Jung
机构
[1] Seoul National University,Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program, College of Engineering
[2] Kyung Hee University,Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering
[3] Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP),Office of R&D Budget and Feasibility Analysis
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2019年 / 26卷
关键词
Annoyance level; Contingent valuation method; Economic value; Traffic noise;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Noise is the most frequently encountered type of environmental pollution in everyday life and has a direct negative effect on humans. Individuals who are constantly exposed to noise tend to have a high incidence of cardiovascular disease and hypertension. Noise sources range from construction sites to political rallies and assemblies, but traffic is one of the most long-lasting and chronic sources of noise. Previously, researchers have conducted valuations of road traffic noise reduction, but they did not consider residents’ annoyance levels in response to traffic noise. However, individuals’ annoyance levels affect the economic value of noise reduction policies and thus must be considered to obtain an accurate estimate. Therefore, this study investigated residents’ willingness to pay for traffic noise reduction depending on their annoyance level. We used the contingent valuation method and a survey to analyze how much 1022 respondents in Korea were willing to pay for noise reduction. We found that people who were annoyed and extremely annoyed by noise had a willingness to pay KRW 8422 (US $7.55) and KRW 9848 (US $8.83) annually per household, respectively, to reduce their annoyance level to zero. In addition, we determined the economic benefits of noise reduction policies using the respondents’ willingness to pay to reduce noise by 1 dB(A), which totaled KRW 3.28 billion (US $2.91 million) per year. The results of this study provide estimates of the annual benefits of traffic noise reduction considering residents’ annoyance level.
引用
收藏
页码:7243 / 7255
页数:12
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] Ali S(2010)Industrial noise levels and annoyance in Egypt Appl Acoust 72 221-225
  • [2] Arrow K(1993)Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation Fed Regist 58 4601-4614
  • [3] Solow R(2006)Stated choice valuations of traffic related noise Transport Res D-Tr E 11 15-31
  • [4] Portney R(2006)Transportation noise and cardiovascular risk: updated review and synthesis of epidemiological studies indicate that the evidence has increased Noise Health 8 1-29
  • [5] Leamer E(2004)Valuation of noise reduction: comparing results from hedonic pricing and contingent valuation AKF Forlaget 51 1-152
  • [6] Radner R(1988)Welfare measurements using contingent valuation: a comparison of techniques Am J Agric Econ 70 20-28
  • [7] Schuman H(2012)Valuing aviation noise with the contingent valuation method: case of Suvarnabhumi Airport, Bangkok, Thailand Transp Res Record: J Trans Res B 2300 42-48
  • [8] Arsenio E(2014)Stated choice valuation of aircraft noise and other environmental externalities at Bangkok Suvarnabhumi Airport Inter-noise and Noise-Con Congress and Conference Proceedings 249 2381-2388
  • [9] Bristow L(2010)Good practice guide on noise exposure and potential health effects EEA Technical Report 11 1-36
  • [10] Wardman M(2018)Health status, mental health and air quality: evidence from pensioners in Europe Environ Sci Pollut R 25 14206-14225