Probabilistic flood forecasting and decision-making: an innovative risk-based approach

被引:0
作者
Murray Dale
Jon Wicks
Ken Mylne
Florian Pappenberger
Stefan Laeger
Steve Taylor
机构
[1] Halcrow (A CH2M HILL Company),
[2] Met Office,undefined
[3] European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF),undefined
[4] Environment Agency of England and Wales,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2014年 / 70卷
关键词
Flood forecasting; Decision-support; Benefit-cost;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Flood forecasting is becoming increasingly important across the world. The exposure of people and property to flooding is increasing and society is demanding improved management of flood risk. At the same time, technological and data advances are enabling improvements in forecasting capabilities. One area where flood forecasting is seeing technical developments is in the use of probabilistic forecasts—these provide a range of possible forecast outcomes that indicate the probability or chance of a flood occurring. While probabilistic forecasts have some distinct benefits, they pose an additional decision-making challenge to those that use them: with a range of forecasts to pick from, which one is right? (or rather, which one(s) can enable me to make the correct decision?). This paper describes an innovative and transferable approach for aiding decision-making with probabilistic forecasts. The proposed risk-based decision-support framework has been tested in a range of flood risk environments: from coastal surge to fluvial catchments to urban storm water scales. The outputs have been designed to be practical and proportionate to the level of flood risk at any location and to be easy to apply in an operational flood forecasting and warning context. The benefits of employing a benefit-cost inspired decision-support framework are that flood forecasting decision-making can be undertaken objectively, with confidence and an understanding of uncertainty, and can save unnecessary effort on flood incident actions. The method described is flexible such that it can be used for a wide range of flood environments with multiple flood incident management actions. It uses a risk-based approach taking into account both the probability and the level of impact of a flood event. A key feature of the framework is that it is based on a full assessment of the flood-related risk, taking into account both the probability and the level of impact of a flood event. A recommendation for action may be triggered by either a higher probability of a lower impact flood or a low probability of a very severe flood. Hence, it is highly innovative as it is the first application of such a risk-based method for flood forecasting and warning purposes. A final benefit is that it is considered to be transferrable to other countries.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 172
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Bowler NE(2008)The MOGREPS short-range ensemble prediction system Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 134 703-722
[2]  
Arribas A(2008)The value of probabilistic prediction Atmos Sci Lett 9 36-42
[3]  
Mylne KR(2009)Ensemble flood forecasting: a review J Hydrol 375 613-626
[4]  
Robertson KB(2000)Cost-benefit analysis and the politics of valuing the environment Radic Stat 73 24-33
[5]  
Beare SE(2009)Can ensemble forecasts improve the reliability of flood alerts? J Flood Risk Manag 2 232-242
[6]  
Buizza R(2009)Review—long lead time flood warnings: reality or fantasy? Meteorol Appl 16 3-12
[7]  
Cloke H(2001)The case for probabilistic forecasting in hydrology J Hydrol 249 2-9
[8]  
Pappenberger F(2007)Improving short-range high-resolution model precipitation forecast skill using time-lagged ensembles Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 133 1487-1500
[9]  
Davies A(2002)Decision-making from probability forecasts based on forecast value Meteorol Appl 9 307-316
[10]  
Demeritt D(2010)Using ensemble predictions for operational flood forecasting: lessons from Sweden J Flood Risk Manag 3 72-79