Red kangaroos (Macropus rufus) receive an antipredator benefit from aggregation

被引:23
作者
Daniel T. Blumstein
Janice C. Daniel
机构
[1] Dept. Organismic Biol., Ecol./Evol., University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606
[2] Coop. Res. Ctr. Conserv./Mgmt. M., Macquarie University, 2109 Sydney, NSW
关键词
Antipredator behavior; Benefits and costs of sociality; Group-size effects; Red kangaroo;
D O I
10.1007/s10211-002-0070-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For species that cannot seek cover to escape predators, aggregation becomes an important strategy to reduce predation risk. However, aggregation may not be entirely beneficial because aggregated animals may compete for access to limited resources and might even attract predators. Available evidence suggests that foraging competition influences time allocation in large-bodied macropodid marsupials, but previous studies have focused primarily on species in areas with protective cover. We studied red kangaroos, a species often found in open country without noticeable cover, to determine whether they experienced a net benefit by aggregation. Red kangaroos varied their time allocation as a function of group size and, importantly, more variation in time allocation to vigilance and foraging was explained by non-linear models than by linear models. This suggests red kangaroos directly translated the reduction of predation risk brought about by aggregation into greater time foraging and less time engaged in vigilance. We infer that red kangaroos received a net benefit by aggregation. Social species living in the open may be generally expected to rely on others to help manage predation risk.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 99
页数:4
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Alexander R.D., The evolution of social behavior, Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 5, pp. 325-383, (1974)
[2]  
Beauchamp G., The effect of group size on mean food intake rate in birds, Biol Rev, 73, pp. 449-472, (1998)
[3]  
Bednekoff P.A., Lima S.L., Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance, Trends Ecol Evol, 13, pp. 284-287, (1998)
[4]  
Bertram B.C.R., Vigilance and group size in ostriches, Anim Behav, 28, pp. 278-286, (1980)
[5]  
Blumstein D.T., Quantifying predation risk for refuging animals: A case study with golden marmots, Ethology, 104, pp. 501-516, (1998)
[6]  
Blumstein D.T., Daniel J.C., Isolation from mammalian predators differentially affects two congeners, Behav Ecol, 13, pp. 657-663, (2002)
[7]  
Blumstein D.T., Evans C.S., Daniel J.C., An experimental study of behavioural group size effects in tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii), Anim Behav, 58, pp. 351-360, (1999)
[8]  
Blumstein D.T., Evans C.S., Daniel J.C., JWatcher 0.9. An Introductory User's Guide, (2000)
[9]  
Blumstein D.T., Daniel J.C., Evans C.S., Yellow-footed rock-wallaby (Petrogale xanthopus) group size effects reflect a trade-off, Ethology, 107, pp. 655-664, (2001)
[10]  
Blumstein D.T., Daniel J.C., McLean I.G., Group size effects in quokkas, Aust J Zool, 49, pp. 641-649, (2001)