Factors to improve odds of success following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a machine learning analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Hong Yeol [1 ]
Shin, Yong Gwan [2 ]
Shin, Hyun Ho [1 ]
Choi, Ji Hoon [1 ]
Seon, Jong Keun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ Med Sch & Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 322 Seoyang Ro, Chungnam 58128, South Korea
[2] XRAI Inc, R&D Ctr, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
关键词
Treatment success; High tibial osteotomy; Knee osteoarthritis; Machine learning; Prediction; Random forest; DOUBLE-LEVEL OSTEOTOMY; ALGORITHMS PREDICT; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CLOSING-WEDGE; KNEE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; SURVIVAL; ARTHROSCOPY; OUTCOMES; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-024-07441-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Although high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an established treatment option for medial compartment osteoarthritis, predictive factors for HTO treatment success remain unclear. This study aimed to identify informative variables associated with HTO treatment success and to develop and internally validate machine learning algorithms to predict which patients will achieve HTO treatment success for medial compartmental osteoarthritis. Methods This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent medial opening-wedge HTO (MOWHTO) at our center between March 2010 and December 2015. The primary outcomes were a lack of conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and achievement of a minimal clinically important difference of improvement in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at a minimum of five years postoperatively. Recursive feature selection was used to identify the combination of variables from an initial pool of 25 features that optimized model performance. Five machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, multilayer perception, support vector machine, elastic-net penalized logistic regression, and random forest) were trained using five-fold cross-validation three times and applied to an independent test set of patients. The performance of the model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results A total of 231 patients were included, and 200 patients (86.6%) achieved treatment success at the mean of 9 years of follow-up. A combination of seven variables optimized algorithm performance, and the following specific cutoffs increased the likelihood of MOWHTO treatment success: body mass index (BMI) <= 26.8 kg/m(2), preoperative KOOS for pain <= 46.0, preoperative KOOS for quality of life <= 33.0, preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score <= 42.0, preoperative Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) score > 42.25, three-month postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle > 1.0 degrees, and three-month postoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) > 91.5 degrees and <= 94.7 degrees. The random forest model demonstrated the best performance (F1 score: 0.93; AUC: 0.81) and was transformed into an online application as an educational tool to demonstrate the capabilities of machine learning. Conclusions The random forest machine learning algorithm best predicted MOWHTO treatment success. Patients with a lower BMI, poor clinical status, slight valgus overcorrection, and postoperative MPTA < 94.7 more frequently achieved a greater likelihood of treatment success.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gait analysis following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy
    Morin, Vincent
    Pailhe, Regis
    Duval, Brice Rubens
    Mader, Roch
    Cognault, Jeremy
    Rouchy, Rene-Christopher
    Saragaglia, Dominique
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (06) : 1838 - 1844
  • [2] Gait analysis following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy
    Vincent Morin
    Régis Pailhé
    Brice Rubens Duval
    Roch Mader
    Jérémy Cognault
    René-Christopher Rouchy
    Dominique Saragaglia
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2018, 26 : 1838 - 1844
  • [3] Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Arthrosis/Overload
    Day, Molly
    Wolf, Brian R.
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (03) : 331 - +
  • [4] Risk factors and preventive strategy for excessive coronal inclination of tibial plateau following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy
    Sohn, Sueen
    Koh, In Jun
    Kim, Man Soo
    In, Yong
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2022, 142 (04) : 561 - 569
  • [5] Factors influencing the posterior tibial slope after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy
    Li, Junwei
    Yang, Qingqing
    Zhang, Min
    Yao, Jie
    Liu, Bolun
    Luan, Yichao
    Chen, Yunlin
    Fang, Chaohua
    Cheng, Cheng-Kung
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2025, 13
  • [6] The effect of wedge and tibial slope angles on knee contact pressure and kinematics following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy
    Black, Marianne S.
    d'Entremont, Agnes G.
    McCormack, Robert G.
    Hansen, Gregory
    Carr, Derek
    Wilson, David R.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 51 : 17 - 25
  • [7] Factors affecting cartilage repair after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy
    Ken Kumagai
    Yasushi Akamatsu
    Hideo Kobayashi
    Yoshihiro Kusayama
    Tomihisa Koshino
    Tomoyuki Saito
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 779 - 784
  • [8] Factors affecting cartilage repair after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy
    Kumagai, Ken
    Akamatsu, Yasushi
    Kobayashi, Hideo
    Kusayama, Yoshihiro
    Koshino, Tomihisa
    Saito, Tomoyuki
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (03) : 779 - 784
  • [9] Treatment of aseptic nonunion after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy
    Rosteius, Thomas
    Rausch, Valentin
    Lotzien, Sebastian
    Seybold, Dominik
    Schildhauer, Thomas Armin
    Gessmann, Jan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 31 (04) : 755 - 762
  • [10] Midterm Follow-up of Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy
    DeMeo, Patrick J.
    Johnson, Eric M.
    Chiang, Peter P.
    Flamm, Angela M.
    Miller, Mark C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (10) : 2077 - 2084