Rats’ Response Rates for 1 % Sucrose When Food-Pellet Reinforcement is Upcoming: Effect Of Upcoming Reinforcement Contingency

被引:0
|
作者
Jeffrey N. Weatherly
Patricia L. Moulton
Jasen J. Ritt
机构
[1] University of North Dakota,Department of Psychology
来源
The Psychological Record | 2002年 / 52卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous research has demonstrated that rats’ rates of lever pressing for 1% liquid-sucrose reinforcers in the first half of a 50-min session increase when food-pellet, rather than the same sucrose, reinforcement will be delivered in the second half of the session. The present study investigated whether this increase (i.e., induction) would be influenced by alterations to the response-reinforcer relationship in the second half of the session. Experiment 1 manipulated this relationship by delaying reinforcers in the second half of the session by 0.1, 1.0, or 10.0 s, in different conditions. Induction was little affected by the delays. Experiment 2 provided reinforcers in the second half of the session on a different schedule of reinforcement (fixed ratio, fixed interval, or differential reinforcement of low rates) across conditions. Induction was large when the fixed-ratio schedule was upcoming and small or absent when the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rates schedule was upcoming. These differences, however, covaried with differences in obtained reinforcement. Experiment 3 eliminated the response-reinforcer relationship in the second half of the session by, in some conditions, delivering reinforcers on a variable-time schedule. Doing so reduced the size of, but did not eliminate, the observed induction. The present results increase the generality of induction and suggest that both the type of upcoming reinforcer and the contingency that deliver that reinforcer can contribute to its appearance.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 240
页数:19
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Rats' response rates for 1% sucrose when food-pellet reinforcement is upcoming: Effect of upcoming reinforcement contingency
    Weatherly, JN
    Moulton, PL
    Ritt, JJ
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2002, 52 (02) : 221 - 240
  • [2] Investigating retrospective influences on induction in rats' responding for 1% sucrose when food-pellet reinforcement is upcoming
    Weatherly, JN
    Arthur, EIL
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 133 (01) : 81 - 95
  • [3] Induction with upcoming food-pellet reinforcement
    Weatherly, JN
    Davis, CS
    Melville, CL
    LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2000, 31 (02) : 180 - 199
  • [4] On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming
    Weatherly, JN
    Plumm, KM
    Smith, JR
    Roberts, WA
    ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 2002, 30 (04): : 315 - 329
  • [5] On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming
    Jeffrey N. Weatherly
    Karyn M. Plumm
    Julia R. Smith
    William A. Roberts
    Animal Learning & Behavior, 2002, 30 : 315 - 329
  • [6] Stimulus control over induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement
    Weatherly, JN
    Tischart, LM
    Palbicki, J
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2003, 64 (01) : 113 - 120
  • [7] Upcoming food-pellet reinforcement alters rats' lever pressing for liquid sucrose delivered by a progressive-ratio schedule
    Weatherly, JN
    King, BM
    Uran, EL
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2003, 63 (02) : 73 - 86
  • [8] Altering "motivational" variables alters induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement
    Weatherly, JN
    Arthur, EIL
    Tischart, LM
    ANIMAL COGNITION, 2003, 6 (01) : 17 - 26
  • [9] Altering "motivational" variables alters induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement
    Jeffrey N. Weatherly
    Emily I. L. Arthur
    Lindsey M. Tischart
    Animal Cognition, 2003, 6 : 17 - 26
  • [10] Induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement: Effects on subsequent operant responding
    Weatherly, JN
    Arthur, EIL
    Palbicki, J
    Nurnberger, JT
    LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2004, 35 (03) : 189 - 207