Comparison of OMERACT-RAMRIS scores and computer-aided dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings of hand and wrist as a measure of activity in rheumatoid arthritis

被引:0
作者
Sebnem Orguc
Canan Tikiz
Zahide Aslanalp
Pinar Dundar Erbay
机构
[1] Celal Bayar University Hospital,
来源
Rheumatology International | 2013年 / 33卷
关键词
Rheumatoid arthritis; Disease activity; Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD); Outcome measures in rheumatology clinical trials (OMERACT);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare the value of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) finding of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and computer-aided dynamic MRI measurements in predicting the activity of disease. The activity of the disease in 40 RA patients was evaluated by the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28). The conventional MRI of the wrists of all patients were scored for bone edema, synovitis and erosions, according to the criteria of RA-MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) developed by Outcome measures in rheumatology clinical trials (OMERACT) MR Imaging Group. Synovitis was also quantified by dynamic postcontrast MRI imaging using color coded maximum slope of increase maps and measurements of early enhancement rate (EER) and relative enhancement (RE). Twenty-two (55 %) patients with a score higher than 5.1 constituted the high disease activity group, 18 (45 %) patients with a score of 5.1 or less constituted moderate disease activity group. The dynamic MRI-EER score was the most significant parameter to differentiate between the groups (p = 0.001). Among OMERACT scores, only bone edema [p = 0.020 for wrist and p = 0.037 for metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP)] had a significant difference between the two groups. Dynamic MRI RE score and OMERACT scores for erosions and synovitis for both the wrist and MCP joints did not differ significantly between the two groups. Computer-aided dynamic MRI is a reliable, noninvasive method of evaluating the RA patients, which correlates with the DAS28 scores, at a higher significance than the OMERACT-RAMRIS scores.
引用
收藏
页码:1837 / 1844
页数:7
相关论文
共 163 条
  • [1] Fleming A(1976)Early rheumatoid disease. II patterns of joint involvement Ann Rheum Dis 35 361-364
  • [2] Benn RT(1996)Plain X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis: overview of scoring methods, their reliability and applicability Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 10 435-453
  • [3] Corbett M(1995)Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum 38 44-48
  • [4] Wood PH(1993)The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials Arthritis Rheum 36 729-740
  • [5] van der Heijde DMFM(1999)Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement Ann Rheum Dis 58 156-163
  • [6] Prevoo ML(1999)Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane volume as a marker of disease activity and a predictor of progressive joint destruction in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum 42 918-929
  • [7] van’t Hof MA(2002)Baseline MRI erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis MCP and wrist joint bones markedly increase the risk of radiographic erosions at 1 year follow-up Arthritis Rheum 46 S521-2131
  • [8] Kuper HH(2003)New radiographic bone erosions in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis are detectable with magnetic resonance imaging a median of two years earlier Arthritis Rheum 48 2128-1827
  • [9] van Leeuwen MA(2003)Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum 48 1814-1150
  • [10] van De Putte LB(2001)Interreader agreement in the assessment of magnetic resonance images of rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints—an international multicenter study J Rheumatol 28 1143-1379