Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Hydrodynamics in USP Apparatus 3—The Influence of Dip Rate

[1] Borst I(1997)New and extended applications for USP drug release Apparatus 3 Dissolution Technologies 4 11-18

[2] Ugwu S(2013)Simulating the hydrodynamic conditions in the United States Pharmacopeia paddle dissolution apparatus AAPS PharmSciTech 4 83-98

[3] Beckett AH(2005)Hydrodynamics-induced variability in the USP Apparatus II dissolution test International Journal of Pharmaceutics 292 17-28

[4] McCarthy LG(2009)Hydrodynamic, mass transfer and dissolution effects induced by tablet location during dissolution testing Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 98 1511-1531

[5] Kosiol C(2009)Mathematical modeling of the fluid dynamics in the flow-through cell International Journal of Pharmaceutics 376 22-40

[6] Healy AM(2010)Hydrodynamic and species transfer simulations in the USP 4 dissolution apparatus: considerations for dissolution in low velocity pulsing flow Pharmaceutical Research 27 246-258

[7] Bradley G(1995)USP dissolution Apparatus 3 (reciprocating cylinder): instrument parameter effects on drug release from sustained release formulations Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 84 922-926

[8] Sexton JC(2007)The effects of buffer molarity, agitation rate, and mesh size on verapamil release from modified-release mini-tablets using USP Apparatus 3 Dissolution Technologies 14 19-23

[9] Corrigan OI(2002)Evaluation of USP Apparatus 3 for dissolution testing of immediate-release products AAPS PharmSci 4 1-5

[10] Baxter JL(1994)Comparison of three dissolution devices for evaluating drug release Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 20 961-980

[1] Borst I(1997)New and extended applications for USP drug release Apparatus 3 Dissolution Technologies 4 11-18

[2] Ugwu S(2013)Simulating the hydrodynamic conditions in the United States Pharmacopeia paddle dissolution apparatus AAPS PharmSciTech 4 83-98

[3] Beckett AH(2005)Hydrodynamics-induced variability in the USP Apparatus II dissolution test International Journal of Pharmaceutics 292 17-28

[4] McCarthy LG(2009)Hydrodynamic, mass transfer and dissolution effects induced by tablet location during dissolution testing Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 98 1511-1531

[5] Kosiol C(2009)Mathematical modeling of the fluid dynamics in the flow-through cell International Journal of Pharmaceutics 376 22-40

[6] Healy AM(2010)Hydrodynamic and species transfer simulations in the USP 4 dissolution apparatus: considerations for dissolution in low velocity pulsing flow Pharmaceutical Research 27 246-258

[7] Bradley G(1995)USP dissolution Apparatus 3 (reciprocating cylinder): instrument parameter effects on drug release from sustained release formulations Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 84 922-926

[8] Sexton JC(2007)The effects of buffer molarity, agitation rate, and mesh size on verapamil release from modified-release mini-tablets using USP Apparatus 3 Dissolution Technologies 14 19-23

[9] Corrigan OI(2002)Evaluation of USP Apparatus 3 for dissolution testing of immediate-release products AAPS PharmSci 4 1-5

[10] Baxter JL(1994)Comparison of three dissolution devices for evaluating drug release Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 20 961-980