Parsing Protection and Risk for Problem Behavior Versus Pro-social Behavior Among US and Chinese Adolescents

被引:0
作者
Richard Jessor
Mark S. Turbin
机构
[1] University of Colorado,Institute of Behavioral Science
来源
Journal of Youth and Adolescence | 2014年 / 43卷
关键词
Protective factors; Risk factors; Problem behavior; Pro-social behavior; Problem Behavior Theory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigates the different roles played by protective factors and risk factors—and by particular protective and risk factors—when the concern is with accounting for adolescent problem behavior than when the concern is with accounting for adolescent pro-social behavior. The protective and risk factor literature on adolescent problem behavior reveals considerable conceptual and operational ambiguity; an aim of the present study was to advance understanding in this domain of inquiry by providing a systematic conceptualization of protection and risk and of their measurement. Within the systematic framework of Problem Behavior Theory, four protective and four risk factors are assessed in a cross-national study of both problem behavior and pro-social behavior involving large adolescent samples in China (N = 1,368) and the US (N = 1,087), in grades 9, 10, and 11; females 56 %, US; 50 %, China. The findings reveal quite different roles for protection and risk, and for particular protective and risk factors, when the outcome criterion is problem behavior than when it is pro-social behavior. The protective factor, Controls Protection, which engages rule and regulations and sanctions in the adolescent’s ecology, emerges as most important in influencing problem behavior, but it plays a relatively minor role in relationship to pro-social behavior. By contrast, Models Protection, the presence of pro-social models in the adolescent’s ecology, and Support Protection, the presence of interest and care in that same ecology, have no significant relationship to problem behavior variation, but they are both the major predictors of variation in pro-social behavior. The findings are robust across the samples from the two very diverse societies. These results suggest that greater attention be given to protection in problem behavior research and that a more nuanced perspective is needed about the roles that particular protective and risk factors play in reducing problem behavior and in promoting pro-social behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1051
页数:14
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
Barber BK(1997)Introduction: Adolescent socialization in context—the role of connection, regulation, and autonomy in the family Journal of Adolescent Research 12 5-11
[2]  
Barber BK(1997)Socialization in context: Connection, regulation, and autonomy in the family, school, and neighborhood, and with peers Journal of Adolescent Research 12 287-315
[3]  
Olsen JA(2012)Risk and direct protective factors for youth violence: Results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health American Journal of Preventive Medicine 43 S57-S66
[4]  
Bernat DH(2003)Adolescent health in the Caribbean: Risk and protective factors American Journal of Public Health 93 456-460
[5]  
Oakes JM(2009)Adolescent risk behavior in Italy and The Netherlands: A cross-national study of psychosocial protective factors European Psychologist 14 180-192
[6]  
Pettingell SL(1990)Things I have learned (so far) American Psychologist 45 1304-1312
[7]  
Resnick M(2005)The role of social contexts in adolescence: Context protection and context risk in the U.S. and China Applied Developmental Science 9 67-85
[8]  
Blum RW(1992)Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention Psychological Bulletin 112 64-105
[9]  
Halcon L(2012)Risk versus direct protective factors and youth violence: Seattle Social Development Project American Journal of Preventive Medicine 43 S41-S56
[10]  
Beuhring T(2014)Beyond the deficit model: Bullying and trajectories of character virtues in adolescence Journal of Youth and Adolescence 12 597-605