The effect of financial development and economic growth on ecological footprint: evidence from top 10 emitter countries

被引:0
作者
Muhammad Shahbaz
Mesut Dogan
Hilmi Tunahan Akkus
Samet Gursoy
机构
[1] Beijing Institute of Technology,School of Management and Economics
[2] Bilecik Seyh Edebali University,Vocational School of Bozuyuk, Department of Banking and Insurance
[3] Balıkesir University,Vocational School of Savastepe, Department of Real Estate Management
[4] Mehmet Akif Ersoy University,Vocational School of Zeliha Tolunay, Customs Business Department
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2023年 / 30卷
关键词
Ecological footprint; Economic growth; Financial development; Non-renewable energy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigates the effect of financial development and economic growth on ecological footprint by including non-renewable energy consumption and trade openness as additional determinants. For this purpose, annual data of 10 countries with the highest ecological footprint (China, the USA, India, Japan, Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Korea, Turkey, and the UK) for the period 1992–2017 is used. The Westerlund and Edgerton (2007) Panel LM bootstrap test results reveal that there is cointegration between the variables. Additionally, the results obtained from the Common Correlated Effects (CCE) coefficient estimator show that financial development, economic growth, and non-renewable energy consumption negatively affect environmental quality by increasing ecological footprint. On other hand, the effect of trade openness on ecological footprint is found to be statistically insignificant. In addition, according to the panel causality test results, a unidirectional causality from financial development to ecological footprint is found while bidirectional causality between economic growth and ecological footprint exists. Therefore, it would be beneficial for policymakers in such countries to direct financial resources to green energy production and consumption and to encourage projects and practices.
引用
收藏
页码:73518 / 73533
页数:15
相关论文
共 154 条
[1]  
Abbasi F(2016)CO Energy Policy 90 102-114
[2]  
Riaz K(2021) emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach Ecol. Indic. 121 107060-10090
[3]  
Ahmed Z(2022)Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29 10077-323
[4]  
Zhang B(2022)Ecological footprint, public-private partnership investment in energy and financial development in Brazil: a gradual shift causality approach J. Clean. Prod 366 132696-267
[5]  
Cary M(2015)Spatial analysis of financial development’s effect on the ecological footprint of belt and road initiative countries: mitigation options through renewable energy consumption and institutional quality Ecol. Indic. 48 315-738
[6]  
Akinsola GD(2022)Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation Energy, Ecol. Environ. 7 250-6208
[7]  
Awosusi AA(2012)Main determinants for ecological footprint: an econometric perspective from G20 countries Energy Econ. 34 733-378
[8]  
Kirikkaleli D(2019)Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: evidence from a panel error correction model Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26 6199-41
[9]  
Umarbeyli S(2013)The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation Econ. Lett. 121 374-253
[10]  
Adeshola I(2014)Testing slope homogeneity in large panels with serial correlation Econ. Model. 40 33-814