Continuous infusion of antibiotics in the critically ill: The new holy grail for beta-lactams and vancomycin?

被引:0
作者
Bruno Van Herendael
Axel Jeurissen
Paul M Tulkens
Erika Vlieghe
Walter Verbrugghe
Philippe G Jorens
Margareta Ieven
机构
[1] Antwerp University Hospital,Department of Microbiology
[2] GZA St. Vincentius Hospital,Department of Microbiology
[3] Université catholique de Louvain,Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology and Centre for Clinical Pharmacy, Louvain Drug Research Institute
[4] Antwerp University Hospital,Department of Tropical Diseases
[5] Institute of Tropical Medicine,Department of Intensive Care Medicine
[6] Antwerp University Hospital,undefined
来源
Annals of Intensive Care | / 2卷
关键词
Continuous infusion; Intermittent infusion; Vancomycin; Beta-lactam; Antibiotic(s); Critically ill; Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The alarming global rise of antimicrobial resistance combined with the lack of new antimicrobial agents has led to a renewed interest in optimization of our current antibiotics. Continuous infusion (CI) of time-dependent antibiotics has certain theoretical advantages toward efficacy based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles. We reviewed the available clinical studies concerning continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics and vancomycin in critically ill patients. We conclude that CI of beta-lactam antibiotics is not necessarily more advantageous for all patients. Continuous infusion is only likely to have clinical benefits in subpopulations of patients where intermittent infusion is unable to achieve an adequate time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (T > MIC). For example, in patients with infections caused by organisms with elevated MICs, patients with altered pharmacokinetics (such as the critically ill) and possibly also immunocompromised patients. For vancomycin CI can be chosen, not always for better clinical efficacy, but because it is practical, cheaper, associated with less AUC24h (area under the curve >24 h)-variability, and easier to monitor.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 431 条
  • [41] Echeverría O(2006)Randomized, open-label, comparative study of piperacillin-tazobactam administered by continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion for treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50 3556-457
  • [42] Gómez-Lus ML(2005)A preliminary study of the administration of carbapenem antibiotics in sepsis patients on the basis of the administration time Jpn J Antibiot 58 452-3310
  • [43] Prieto J(2007)Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of continuous versus short-term infusion of imipenem-cilastatin in critically ill patients in a randomized, controlled trial Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51 3304-548
  • [44] Lipman J(2007)Continuous-infusion penicillin home-based therapy for serious infections due to penicillin-susceptible pathogens Int J Antimicrob Agents 29 544-314
  • [45] Gomersall CD(2001)The efficacy of continuous infusion flucloxacillin in home therapy for serious staphylococcal infections and cellulitis J Antimicrob Chemother 48 311-118
  • [46] Gin T(1999)The clinical efficacy of continuous-infusion flucloxacillin in serious staphylococcal sepsis J Antimicrob Chemother 43 113-2019
  • [47] Joynt GM(2009)Continuous versus intermittent infusion of oxacillin for treatment of infective endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53 2014-483
  • [48] Young RJ(2002)Clinical efficacy and pharmacoeconomics of a continuous-infusion piperacillin-tazobactam program in a large community teaching hospital Pharmacotherapy 22 471-363
  • [49] Jaruratanasirikul S(2007)Piperacillin-tazobactam for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: clinical implications of an extended-infusion dosing strategy Clin Infect Dis 44 357-468
  • [50] Sriwiriyajan S(2009)Clinical cure of ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with piperacillin/tazobactam administered by continuous or intermittent infusion Int J Antimicrob Agents 33 464-2439