Continuous infusion of antibiotics in the critically ill: The new holy grail for beta-lactams and vancomycin?

被引:0
作者
Bruno Van Herendael
Axel Jeurissen
Paul M Tulkens
Erika Vlieghe
Walter Verbrugghe
Philippe G Jorens
Margareta Ieven
机构
[1] Antwerp University Hospital,Department of Microbiology
[2] GZA St. Vincentius Hospital,Department of Microbiology
[3] Université catholique de Louvain,Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology and Centre for Clinical Pharmacy, Louvain Drug Research Institute
[4] Antwerp University Hospital,Department of Tropical Diseases
[5] Institute of Tropical Medicine,Department of Intensive Care Medicine
[6] Antwerp University Hospital,undefined
来源
Annals of Intensive Care | / 2卷
关键词
Continuous infusion; Intermittent infusion; Vancomycin; Beta-lactam; Antibiotic(s); Critically ill; Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The alarming global rise of antimicrobial resistance combined with the lack of new antimicrobial agents has led to a renewed interest in optimization of our current antibiotics. Continuous infusion (CI) of time-dependent antibiotics has certain theoretical advantages toward efficacy based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles. We reviewed the available clinical studies concerning continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics and vancomycin in critically ill patients. We conclude that CI of beta-lactam antibiotics is not necessarily more advantageous for all patients. Continuous infusion is only likely to have clinical benefits in subpopulations of patients where intermittent infusion is unable to achieve an adequate time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (T > MIC). For example, in patients with infections caused by organisms with elevated MICs, patients with altered pharmacokinetics (such as the critically ill) and possibly also immunocompromised patients. For vancomycin CI can be chosen, not always for better clinical efficacy, but because it is practical, cheaper, associated with less AUC24h (area under the curve >24 h)-variability, and easier to monitor.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 431 条
  • [1] Carlet J(2011)Society's failure to protect a precious resource: antibiotics Lancet 378 369-371
  • [2] Collignon P(2009)Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America Clin Infect Dis 48 1-12
  • [3] Goldmann D(1998)Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibiotic dosing of mice and men Clin Infect Dis 26 1-10
  • [4] Goossens H(1996)Is continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics worthwhile?–efficacy and pharmacokinetic considerations J Antimicrob Chemother 38 5-15
  • [5] Gyssens IC(2007)Concentration-effect relationship of ceftazidime explains why the time above the MIC is 40 percent for a static effect in vivo Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51 3449-3451
  • [6] Harbarth S(1995)Interrelationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in determining dosing regimens for broad-spectrum cephalosporins Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 22 89-96
  • [7] Jarlier V(1996)Antimicrobial resistance issues of the future Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 25 213-217
  • [8] Levy SB(2008)Evaluation of area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC) and time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) as predictors of outcome for cefepime and ceftazidime in serious bacterial infections Int J Antimicrob Agents 31 345-351
  • [9] N'doye B(1994)Killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during continuous and intermittent infusion of ceftazidime in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38 931-936
  • [10] Pittet D(2005)Is there a pharmacodynamic need for the use of continuous versus intermittent infusion with ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An in vitro pharmacodynamic model J Antimicrob Chemother 55 209-213