Theorising the Fiduciary: Ontology and Ethics

被引:0
作者
Helen J. Mussell
机构
[1] Cardiff University,Cardiff Business School
[2] University of Cambridge,Centre for Business Research, Cambridge Judge Business School
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2023年 / 186卷
关键词
Fiduciary; Ontology; Ethics of care;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the omnipresence of the fiduciary in business organisations, there is an omission of theorisations of this legal concept within business ethics literature. This is surprising considering its widespread and embedded use, but even more so given that the presence of ethics within the fiduciary is increasingly contested ground. This article addresses both issues by theorising the fiduciary using an ontological analysis—one which subsequently helps identify a suitable ethical framework. The article argues on two grounds that the ontology of the fiduciary is inherently relational; it renders the fiduciary’s implicit ontology explicit. Firstly, the fiduciary is shown to be process-oriented, indicating an open, emergent, and relational ontology at work. Secondly, historical investigation of the development of the fiduciary highlights its core relationship structure, and the interdependency and power dynamic embedded in the fiduciary are revealed. The argument is advanced that by bringing this inherent relational ontology to the fore, we can see how a relational ethical framework—the Ethics of Care—is best placed to explicate the ethics at work in the fiduciary. The article concludes with a discussion outlining how this ontological theorisation offers utility in steering future practice of the fiduciary.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 307
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[42]   From the Manuscripts of 1844 to The Capital: notes on ethics and ontology in the thought of Karl Marx [J].
Fazio, Ariel .
DAIMON-REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE FILOSOFIA, 2013, (58) :95-108
[43]   The Turn from Ontology to Ethics: Three Kantian Responses to Three Levinasian Critiques [J].
Truwant, Simon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2014, 22 (05) :696-715
[44]   Bioethics a challenge for Politics, Ontology, and Ethics: A view from the praxis of Bioethics committees [J].
Velasquez Fandino, Layty Alvinzy .
REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE BIOETICA, 2013, 8 (02) :200-208
[45]   SUBJECT AND METHOD: IDEOLOGY, ONTOLOGY, ETHICS. (ALTHUSSER, BADIOU, FOUCAULT.) [J].
Farran, Roque .
ASTROLABIO-NUEVA EPOCA, 2018, (20) :302-322
[46]   Digital nominalism. Notes on the ethics of information society in vi of the ontology of the digital [J].
Vadén T. .
Ethics and Information Technology, 2004, 6 (4) :223-231
[47]   A critical political ecology of human dimensions of climate change: Epistemology, ontology, and ethics [J].
Goldman, Mara J. ;
Turner, Matthew D. ;
Daly, Meaghan .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 9 (04)
[48]   Two challenges for fiduciary capitalism [J].
Monks, Robert A. G. .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2007, 15 (03) :486-492
[49]   ADEQUATE IDEA AND ORDER OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE TREATY OF THE REFORM OF THE UNDERSTANDING OF SPINOZA: PROLEGOMENA TO THE ONTOLOGY OF ETHICS [J].
Sibilia, Guillermo .
AGORA-PAPELES DE FILOSOFIA, 2023, 42 (02)
[50]   Theorising the Normative Business Model [J].
Randles, Sally ;
Laasch, Oliver .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 29 (01) :53-73