Sonochemical Degradation of Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds in Water: Effects of Physicochemical Properties of the Compounds on Degradation

被引:0
作者
Jong-Sung Park
Nam-Guk Her
Yeomin Yoon
机构
[1] Korea Army Academy,Department of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences
[2] University of South Carolina,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
来源
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution | 2011年 / 215卷
关键词
Chlorinated phenolic compounds; HPLC/MS; Ultrasound frequency; Degradation rate; Physicochemical properties;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examined a comparative degradation of various chlorinated phenolic compounds including phenol, 4-chlorophenol (4-CP), 2,6-dichlorophenol (2,6-DCP), 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (2,4,6-TCP), 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol (2,3,4,6-TeCP), and pentachlorophenol (PCP) using 28, 580, and 1,000 kHz ultrasonic reactors. The concentration of hydrogen peroxide was also determined in order to investigate the efficacy of different sonochemical reactors for hydroxyl radical production. Clearly, it was observed that the 580 kHz sonochemical reactor had maximum efficacy for hydroxyl radical production. The degradation of all the compounds followed the order; 580 kHz (91–93%) > 1,000 kHz (84–86%) > 28 kHz (17–34%) with an initial concentration of 2.5 mg L−1 at a reaction time of 40 min with ultrasonic power of 200 ± 3 W and aqueous temperature of 20 ± 1°C in each experiment. Overall, the degradation of those phenolic compounds followed the order, PCP > 2,3,4,6-TeCP > 2,4,6-TCP > 2,6-DCP > 4-CP > phenol at various frequencies in the presence/absence of a radical scavenger (tert-butyl alcohol). It was revealed that the correlations between the compound degradation rates and the physicochemical parameters, R2 = 0.99 for octanol–water partition coefficient, R2 = 0.95 for water solubility, R2 = 0.94 for vapor pressure, and R2 = 0.88 for Henry’s law constant, excluding PCP, were very good in the entire range of each parameter.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 593
页数:8
相关论文
共 135 条
[21]  
Wilhelm AM(2006)Sonolysis of 4-chlorophenol in aqueous solution: Effects of substrate concentration, aqueous temperature and ultrasonic frequency Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 13 415-422
[22]  
Petrignani JF(1999)Sonolytic destruction of methyl tert-butyl ether by ultrasonic irradiation: The role of O-3, H2O2, frequency, and power density Environmental Science & Technology 33 3199-3205
[23]  
Buikema AL(2002)Kinetic modeling of Fenton oxidation of phenol and monochlorophenols Chemosphere 47 915-924
[24]  
McGinniss MJ(2007)Sonochemical degradation of 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins in aqueous solution with Fe(III)/UV system Chemosphere 69 1261-1266
[25]  
Cairns J(1979)Priority pollutants I—A perspective review Environmental Science & Technology 13 416-423
[26]  
Buxton GV(2006)Ultrasonic destruction of phenol and substituted phenols: A review of current research Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 13 195-199
[27]  
Greenstock CL(1988)Photocatalytic production of H2O2 and organic peroxides in aqueous suspensions of TiO2, ZnO, and desert sand Environmental Science & Technologie 22 798-806
[28]  
Helman WP(1986)Assessment of the impact of the emission of certain organochlorine compounds on the aquatic environment. 1. Monochlorophenols and 2, 4-dichlorophenol Chemosphere 15 825-860
[29]  
Ross AB(1987)Sonochemistry. 1. The physical aspects Chemical Society Reviews 16 239-274
[30]  
Chand R(2009)Sonochemical decomposition of hydrazine in water: Effects of coal ash and pH on the decomposition and adsorption behavior Chemosphere 76 716-720