Characterization of sources of resistance to fusarium wilt in chickpea

被引:0
作者
Shinde A. [1 ]
Kulwal P. [1 ]
Perne R. [2 ,3 ]
Jadhav A. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Level Biotechnology Centre, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, MS
[2] Pulses Improvement Project, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, MS
[3] Regional Wheat Rust Research Station, Mahabaleshwar, MS
关键词
Chickpea; Diversity; Marker; Wilt;
D O I
10.1007/s42360-020-00242-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Chickpea is an important cool-season food legume grown and consumed throughout the world. Amongst various biotic stresses which affect chickpea production, wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum is one of the important diseases. Over the years, different races of this pathogen have been identified and characterized. Because of the significance of this disease, it is a prerequisite that the chickpea genotypes (both new as well as old) must be evaluated for their reaction against wilt before they are released as a new variety. In the present study, 31 chickpea genotypes comprising promising lines and earlier released varieties were evaluated for wilt resistance in the wilt sick plot. In addition, 18 SSR markers, which were earlier reported to be linked with wilt resistance QTLs were used to characterize these genotypes. The wilt reaction ranged from resistant [0% (WR 315) to 10% (PG 15,016, Vijay)] to highly susceptible type [53.33% (BG 3065; NDG 14–11) to 100% (JG 62)]. It was observed that majority of the lines from North India were susceptible to wilt, while those from the state of Maharashtra (western India) were resistant indicating that the genotypes from different parts of India have resistance against different races which are prevalent in different regions. It was also observed that molecular markers could group these chickpea genotypes largely based on their reaction against wilt and to some extent on the basis of their pedigree. © 2020, Indian Phytopathological Society.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 705
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Borse V.V., Kulwal P.L., Mhase L.B., Jadhav A.S., Validation of seed weight-associated SSR markers and their usefulness in distinguishing chickpea genotypes according to seed size, Agric Res, 6, 2, pp. 130-138, (2017)
[2]  
Bradbury P.J., Zhang Z., Kroon D.E., Casstevens T.M., Ramdoss Y., Buckler E.S., TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples, Bioinfo, 23, pp. 2633-2635, (2007)
[3]  
Del Mar Jimenez-Gasco M.M., Jimenez-Diaz R.M., Development of a specific polymerase chain reaction-based assay for the identification of Fusarium oxysporum f. Sp. ciceris and its pathogenic races 0, 1A, 5, and 6, Phytopathology, 93, pp. 200-209, (2003)
[4]  
Dubey S.C., Singh S.R., Virulence analysis and oligonucleotide fingerprinting to detect diversity among Indian isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris causing chickpea wilt, Mycopathologia, 165, pp. 389-406, (2008)
[5]  
Haware M.P., Nene Y.L., Natarajan M., Survival of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri in the soil in the absence of chickpea, Phytopathol Mediterr, 35, (1996)
[6]  
Jimenez-Fernandez D., Landa B.B., Kang S., Jimenez-Diaz R.M., Navas-Cortes J.A., Quantitative and microscopic assessment of compatible and incompatible interactions between chickpea cultivars and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris Races, PLoS ONE, 8, (2013)
[7]  
Khan M.R., Ashraf S., Rasool F., Salati K.M., Mohiddin F.A., Haque Z., Field performance of Trichoderma species against wilt disease complex of chickpea caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. Sp. ciceri and Rhizoctonia solani, Turk J Agric For, 38, 4, pp. 447-454, (2014)
[8]  
Murray M.G., Thompson W.F., Rapid isolation of high molecular weight DNA, Nucleic Acids Res, 8, pp. 4321-4325, (1980)
[9]  
Pande S., Kishore G.K., Upadhyaya H.D., Rao J.N., Identification of sources of multiple disease resistance in mini-core collection of chickpea, Plant Dis, 90, 9, pp. 1214-1218, (2006)
[10]  
Sharma K.D., Chen W., Muehlbauer F.J., Genetics of chickpea resistance to five races of Fusarium wilt and a concise set of race differentials for Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris, Plant Dis, 89, 4, pp. 385-390, (2005)