Foreign direct investment along the Belt and Road: A political economy perspective

被引:0
作者
Jiatao Li
Ari Van Assche
Lee Li
Gongming Qian
机构
[1] Hong Kong University of Science and Technology,Department of Management
[2] HEC Montréal,School of Administrative Studies
[3] York University,undefined
[4] Southern University of Science and Technology,undefined
来源
Journal of International Business Studies | 2022年 / 53卷
关键词
Belt and Road Initiative; institutions; geopolitics; bargaining; FDI; jockeying strategies; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2013, China launched its ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a large portfolio of infrastructure projects across 71 countries intended to link Eurasian markets by rail and sea. The state-led nature of the Initiative combined with its transformative geopolitical implications have conditioned the type of engagement that many governments and firms in host and third countries are willing to take in Chinese-funded BRI projects. Building on two theoretical streams that have originated in international political economy but have received growing attention in international business, varieties of capitalism and geopolitics, this perspective shows how a greater understanding of the institutional and geopolitical context surrounding BRI helps decipher the selection of host-country firms and third-country MNEs in Chinese-funded BRI projects. We portray firm selection in a BRI project as the outcome of a one-tier bargaining game between China and a host country. We show how institutions and geopolitics influence both the legitimacy gap of Chinese SOEs in a host country and the host country’s relative bargaining power, affecting the likelihood that host firms and third-country MNEs are selected in BRI projects. We also discuss the geopolitical jockeying strategies that these firms can adopt to influence the outcome of the bargaining game.
引用
收藏
页码:902 / 919
页数:17
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]  
Awate S(2012)EMNE catch-up strategies in the wind turbine industry: Is there a trade-off between output and innovative capabilities Global Strategy Journal 2 205-223
[2]  
Larsen M(2018)China’s Belt and Road Initiative and India’s concerns Strategic Analysis 42 313-332
[3]  
Mudambi R(2020)A critical look at Chinese ‘debt-trap diplomacy’: The rise of a meme Area Development and Policy 5 1-14
[4]  
Blah M(2013)Reputation and political legitimacy: ITT in Chile, 1927–1972 Business History Review 87 729-755
[5]  
Brautigam D(2020)China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the COVID-19 crisis Journal of International Business Policy 3 311-314
[6]  
Bucheli M(2018)A retrospective and agenda for future research on Chinese outward foreign direct investment Journal of International Business Studies 49 4-23
[7]  
Salvaj E(2020)Social influence and MNE strategic response to political risk: A global network approach Journal of International Business Studies 51 829-850
[8]  
Buckley PJ(2010)An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment Journal of International Business Studies 41 567-586
[9]  
Buckley P(2021)Assessing the Belt and Road Initiative as a narrative: Implications for institutional change and international firm strategy Asia Pacific Journal of Management 7 104-123
[10]  
Clegg L(2018)The Belt and Road Initiative—The new Silk Road: A research agenda Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 45 319-335