Meta-analysis of contingent valuation studies on air pollution-related morbidity risks

被引:1
作者
Vassanadumrongdee S. [1 ]
Matsuoka S. [1 ]
Shirakawa H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima
关键词
Air pollution; Contingent valuation; Meta-analysis; Short-term morbidity valuation;
D O I
10.1007/BF03353929
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Benefits of reduced morbidity are important information for cost-benefit analyses of air pollution control policies. With an increasing number of morbidity valuation studies, policymakers are facing some difficulty handling the accumulated information. This article uses a meta-analysis to attain insights from the literature on economic valuation of short-term health effects due to air pollution. Sixteen available contingent valuation studies on morbidity risk valuation were pooled to identify the relations between willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates and possible influential factors. The results indicate that health risk characteristics expressed in terms of severity and duration of illness, population characteristics (e.g., income and education), and study features affect individuals’ WTP to reduce or avoid a given morbidity. By controlling for these factors, a meta-regression-based function can be used to predict WTP values for use in benefit analyses of policy evaluation. © 2004, Springer Japan.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 47
页数:36
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [11] Cropper M.L., Has economic research answered the needs of environmental policy?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, pp. 328-350, (2000)
  • [12] Cropper M.L., Oates W.E., Environmental economics: a survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 30, pp. 675-740, (1992)
  • [13] Desvousges W.H., Johnson F.R., Banzhaf H.S., Environmental policy analysis with limited information: principles and applications of the transfer method, (1998)
  • [14] Dickie M., Gerking S., Willingness to pay for ozone control: inferences from the demand for medical care, Journal of Environmental Economic and Management, 21, pp. 1-16, (1991)
  • [15] Gerking S., Stanley L.R., An economic analysis of air pollution and health: the case of St. Louis, Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, pp. 115-121, (1986)
  • [16] Green W.H., Econometric analysis, (2000)
  • [17] Hall B.H., Cummins C., Time Series Processor 4.5: reference manual, (1999)
  • [18] Hall J., Winer A.M., Kleinman M.T., Lurmann F.W., Brajer V., Colome S.D., Valuing the health benefits of clean air, Science, 255, pp. 812-817, (1992)
  • [19] International Monetary Fund, International financial statistics yearbook, (2001)
  • [20] Johnson F.R., Fries E.E., Banzhaf H.S., Valuing morbidity: an integration of the willingness-to-pay and health-status index literatures, Journal of Health Economics, 16, pp. 641-665, (1997)