Effectiveness of autofluorescence to identify suspicious oral lesions—a prospective, blinded clinical trial

被引:0
作者
Felix Peter Koch
Peer W. Kaemmerer
Stefan Biesterfeld
Martin Kunkel
Wilfried Wagner
机构
[1] University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz,Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
[2] Düsseldorf University Hospital,Institute of Cytopathology
[3] Ruhr-University Bochum Medical School,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
[4] Mund-,undefined
[5] Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie,undefined
来源
Clinical Oral Investigations | 2011年 / 15卷
关键词
Autofluorescence; Prevention; Minimal invasive; Oral cancer; Diagnostic; Clinical trial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Regular screening through white light inspection of the entire oral mucosa is the most important examination method to identify precancerous lesions and early oral carcinoma. Additionally, the physiologic autofluorescence of the oral mucosa has been described as a novel screening method for the detection of mucosal lesions that are not visible by white light. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the autofluorescence examination. Seventy-eight patients were examined in this study. All of them suffered from suspicious oral mucosal lesions. Two different investigation methods were applied: the standard examination by white light and an examination by a novel light source of 400 nm that evoked a green light emission (>500 nm) in normal mucosa. It was proposed that malignant oral mucosal lesions show different autofluorescence characteristics than the green autofluorescence of healthy mucosa. Red autofluorescence indicated SCC with a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 98%. The results showed that dysplasia and carcinoma could be identified with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 18% by using the autofluorescence method. The sensitivity decreased according to the grade of mucosal keratosis and was influenced by the localisation of the lesion. In conclusion, benign as well as malignant oral lesions could not be distinguished by a diminished autofluorescence signal. A red autofluorescence signal, however, could indicate cancerous processes of the oral mucosa.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 982
页数:7
相关论文
共 167 条
[1]  
Parkin DM(2005)Global cancer statistics, 2002 CA Cancer J Clin 55 74-108
[2]  
Bray F(1988)Early diagnosis of oral cancer Cancer 62 1796-1799
[3]  
Ferlay J(2001)Demographics and occurrence of oral and pharyngeal cancers. The outcomes, the trends, the challenge J Am Dent Assoc 132 7S-11S
[4]  
Pisani P(2004)Speech intelligibility and quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors Laryngoscope 114 1977-1981
[5]  
Silverman S(2005)Psychosocial effects in long-term head and neck cancer survivors Head Neck 27 281-288
[6]  
Silverman S(2004)Aspiration, weight loss, and quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130 1100-1103
[7]  
Meyer TK(2007)OralCDx brush biopsy—a tool for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 117 222-227
[8]  
Kuhn JC(2001)Prognostic significance of DNA cytometry in carcinoma of the uterine cervix FIGO stage IB and II Anal Cell Pathol 23 97-105
[9]  
Campbell BH(2002)Detection of TP53-mutations in brush biopsies from oral leukoplakias Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 6 410-414
[10]  
Marbella AM(2001)Loss of heterozygosity: a potential tool in management of oral premalignant lesions? J Oral Pathol Med 30 513-520