Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift

被引:0
作者
Trisha Greenhalgh
Chrysanthi Papoutsi
机构
[1] University of Oxford,Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences
[2] Radcliffe Primary Care Building,undefined
[3] Radcliffe Observatory Quarter,undefined
来源
BMC Medicine | / 16卷
关键词
Complexity; Systems thinking; Methodology; Healthcare;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Complexity is much talked about but sub-optimally studied in health services research. Although the significance of the complex system as an analytic lens is increasingly recognised, many researchers are still using methods that assume a closed system in which predictive studies in general, and controlled experiments in particular, are possible and preferred. We argue that in open systems characterised by dynamically changing inter-relationships and tensions, conventional research designs predicated on linearity and predictability must be augmented by the study of how we can best deal with uncertainty, unpredictability and emergent causality. Accordingly, the study of complexity in health services and systems requires new standards of research quality, namely (for example) rich theorising, generative learning, and pragmatic adaptation to changing contexts. This framing of complexity-informed health services research provides a backdrop for a new collection of empirical studies. Each of the initial five papers in this collection illustrates, in different ways, the value of theoretically grounded, methodologically pluralistic, flexible and adaptive study designs. We propose an agenda for future research and invite researchers to contribute to this on-going series.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
Plsek PE(2001)Complexity science - the challenge of complexity in health care BMJ 323 625-628
[2]  
Greenhalgh T(2001)Complexity and clinical care BMJ 323 685-688
[3]  
Wilson T(2001)Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations BMJ 323 746-749
[4]  
Holt T(2001)Complexity science - coping with complexity: educating for capability BMJ 323 799-803
[5]  
Greenhalgh T(2018)When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change BMC Med 16 63-43
[6]  
Plsek PE(2018)Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes: empirical application of the NASSS framework BMC Med 16 66-1283
[7]  
Wilson T(2013)Entangled complexity: why complex interventions are just not complicated enough J Health Serv Res Policy 18 40-276
[8]  
Fraser SW(2008)Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation BMJ 336 1281-128
[9]  
Greenhalgh T(2009)Theorising interventions as events in systems American J Commun Psychol 43 267-245
[10]  
Braithwaite J(2013)Realist RCTs of complex interventions – an oxymoron Soc Sci Med 94 124-1563