Development of ANN-Based Universal Predictor for Prediction of Blast-Induced Vibration Indicators and its Performance Comparison with Existing Empirical Models

被引:0
作者
Amit Kumar Gorai
Vivek Kumar Himanshu
Chiranjibi Santi
机构
[1] National Institute of Technology,Department of Mining Engineering
[2] CSIR-Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research,undefined
来源
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration | 2021年 / 38卷
关键词
Air overpressure; Peak particle velocity; Blast vibration; Universal predictor; ANN model; Empirical model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Air overpressure (AOp) and peak particle velocity (PPV) are the most undesirable effects of blasting in mines. It is an urgent need to design a predictor model for AOp and PPV for universal applications to minimize environmental effects and damages that occur due to blasting. The present study attempts to design an artificial neural network (ANN) model for the prediction of AOp and PPV in different conditions. In this study, the blast design parameters (number of holes, depth of the blast hole, stemming length, spacing, burden, distance of vibration monitoring location from the blast site, charge weight per delay) of two active mines (coal and iron ore) are considered in four different conditions for training and testing of the model for the prediction of AOp and PPV. The model was trained and tested in four different combinations of data (trained using data of one mine and tested using data of another mine, trained and tested using data of coal mine, trained and tested using data of an iron ore mine, trained and tested using combined data of both the mines) for examining the applicability in different conditions. The results indicate that R2 values are ranged from 0.886 to 0.908 and 0.8728 to 0.8959, respectively, in the prediction of PPV and AOp. A comparative study of the performances of the developed model with the other empirical model is also demonstrated. For this, the site constants of different empirical models were estimated individually for both the mines. The study results indicated that the ANN model performs much better than all the empirical models. It can be inferred from the results that blast vibration cannot be accurately predicted only from charge per delay and distance from the blast hole. The ANN model was considered many other factors and thus can predict the vibration level more accurately.
引用
收藏
页码:2021 / 2036
页数:15
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Amiri M(2016)A new combination of artificial neural network and K-nearest neighbors models to predict blast-induced ground vibration and air-overpressure Eng Comput 32 631-644
[2]  
Bakhshandeh AH(2000)Ground vibrations from sheetpile driving in urban environment: measurements, analysis and effects on buildings and occupants Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 19 371-387
[3]  
Hasanipanah M(2014)Blast vibration dependence on charge length, velocity of detonation and layered media Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 65 29-39
[4]  
Mohammad KL(2020)Prediction of blast-induced air over-pressure in open-pit mine: assessment of different artificial intelligence techniques Nat Resour Res 29 571-591
[5]  
Athanasopoulos GA(2014)Numerical study on tunnel damage subject to blast-induced shock wave in jointed rock masses Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 43 88-100
[6]  
Pelekis PC(2015)Blast-induced air and ground vibration prediction: a particle swarm optimization-based artificial neural network approach Environ Earth Sci 74 2799-2817
[7]  
Blair DP(2014)Prediction of airblast-overpressure induced by blasting using a hybrid artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization Appl Acoust 80 57-67
[8]  
Bui XN(2021)Prediction of air-overpressure induced by blasting using an ANFIS-PNN model optimized by GA Appl Soft Comput 99 460-53
[9]  
Nguyen H(2018)Multivariate statistical analysis approach for prediction of blast-induced ground vibration Arab J Geosci 11 45-1222
[10]  
Le HA(2017)Classification and regression tree technique in estimating peak particle velocity caused by blasting Eng Comput 33 1214-349