Boosting learning and inference in Markov logic through metaheuristics

被引:0
作者
Marenglen Biba
Stefano Ferilli
Floriana Esposito
机构
[1] University of Bari,Department of Computer Science
来源
Applied Intelligence | 2011年 / 34卷
关键词
Statistical relational learning; Markov logic; Metaheuristics; Inference; Structure learning; Probabilistic graphical models;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Markov Logic (ML) combines Markov networks (MNs) and first-order logic by attaching weights to first-order formulas and using these as templates for features of MNs. State-of-the-art structure learning algorithms in ML maximize the likelihood of a database by performing a greedy search in the space of structures. This can lead to suboptimal results because of the incapability of these approaches to escape local optima. Moreover, due to the combinatorially explosive space of potential candidates these methods are computationally prohibitive. We propose a novel algorithm for structure learning in ML, based on the Iterated Local Search (ILS) metaheuristic that explores the space of structures through a biased sampling of the set of local optima. We show through real-world experiments that the algorithm improves accuracy and learning time over the state-of-the-art algorithms. On the other side MAP and conditional inference for ML are hard computational tasks. This paper presents two algorithms for these tasks based on the Iterated Robust Tabu Search (IRoTS) metaheuristic. The first algorithm performs MAP inference and we show through extensive experiments that it improves over the state-of-the-art algorithm in terms of solution quality and inference time. The second algorithm combines IRoTS steps with simulated annealing steps for conditional inference and we show through experiments that it is faster than the current state-of-the-art algorithm maintaining the same inference quality.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 298
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Inference with constrained hidden Markov models in PRISM
    Christiansen, Henning
    Have, Christian Theil
    Lassen, Ole Torp
    Petit, Matthieu
    [J]. THEORY AND PRACTICE OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING, 2010, 10 : 449 - 464
  • [32] A comprehensive survey on optimizing deep learning models by metaheuristics
    Bahriye Akay
    Dervis Karaboga
    Rustu Akay
    [J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2022, 55 : 829 - 894
  • [33] Finite Satisfiability of Interval Temporal Logic Formulas with Multi-Objective Metaheuristics
    Bresolin, Davide
    Jimenez, Fernando
    Sanchez, Gracia
    Sciavicco, Guido
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE-VALUED LOGIC AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 28 (2-3) : 217 - 249
  • [34] A comprehensive survey on optimizing deep learning models by metaheuristics
    Akay, Bahriye
    Karaboga, Dervis
    Akay, Rustu
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2022, 55 (02) : 829 - 894
  • [35] Machine Learning for Determining the Transition Point in Hybrid Metaheuristics
    Bolufe-Rohler, Antonio
    Yuan, Ye
    [J]. 2021 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC 2021), 2021, : 1115 - 1122
  • [36] Automated classification tree evolution through hybrid metaheuristics
    Bursa, Miroslav
    Lhotska, Lenka
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN HYBRID INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2007, 44 : 191 - +
  • [37] Learning Bayesian networks with low inference complexity
    Benjumeda M.
    Larrañaga P.
    Bielza C.
    [J]. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (1) : 15 - 26
  • [38] Boosting constrained teaching-learning based optimization algorithm through group discussion
    Sagheer, Muhammad
    Jan, Muhammad Asif
    Bonyah, Ebenezer
    Mashwani, Wali Khan
    Shah, Zahir
    Khanum, Rashida Adeeb
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AFRICAN, 2024, 24
  • [39] Quadratization and Roof Duality of Markov Logic Networks
    de Nijs, Roderick
    Landsiedel, Christian
    Wollher, Dirk
    Buss, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2016, 55 : 685 - 714
  • [40] INVESTIGATING MARKOV LOGIC NETWORKS FOR COLLECTIVE CLASSIFICATION
    Crane, Robert
    McDowell, Luke K.
    [J]. ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 1, 2012, : 5 - 15