Influenza vaccination in Dutch nursing homes: Is tacit consent morally justified?

被引:6
作者
Verweij M.F. [1 ]
van den Hoven M.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ethiek Instituut, Utrecht University, NL-3584 CS Utrecht
关键词
Ethics; Influenza vaccination; Informed consent; Nursing homes; Tacit consent;
D O I
10.1007/s11019-004-0837-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Efficient procedures for obtaining informed (proxy) consent may contribute to high influenza vaccination rates in nursing homes. Yet are such procedures justified? This study's objective was to gain insight in informed consent policies in Dutch nursing homes; to assess how these may affect influenza vaccination rates and to answer the question whether deviating from standard informed consent procedures could be morally justified. Design: A survey among nursing home physicians. Setting & Participants: We sent a questionnaire to all (356) nursing homes in the Netherlands, to be completed by one of the physicians. Results: We received 245 completed questionnaires. As 21 institutions appeared to be closed or merged into other institutions, the response was 73.1% (245/335). Of all respondents 81.9% reported a vaccination rate above 80%. Almost 50% reported a vaccination rate above 90%. Most respondents considered herd immunity to be an important consideration for institutional policy. Freedom of choice for residents was considered important by almost all. Nevertheless, 106 out of 245 respondents follow a tacit consent procedure, according to which vaccination will be administered unless the resident or her proxy refuses. These institutions show significantly higher vaccination rates (p < 0.03). Conclusions: In our discussion we focus on the question whether tacit consent procedures can be morally justifiable. Such procedures assume that vaccination is good for residents either as individuals or as a group. Even though this assumption may be true for most residents, there are good reasons for preferring express consent procedures. © Springer 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 95
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Arden N., Monto A.S., Ohmit S.E., Vaccine Use and the Risk of Outbreaks in a Sample of Nursing Homes during an Influenza Epidemic, American Journal of Public Health, 85, pp. 399-401, (1995)
  • [2] Beauchamp T.J., Childress F.J., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, (2001)
  • [3] Carman W.F., Elder A.G., Wallace L.A., McAulay K., Walker A., Murray G.D., Stott D.J., Effects of Influenza Vaccination of Health-care Workers on Mortality of Elderly People in Long-term care: A randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 355, pp. 93-97, (2000)
  • [4] Coles F.B., Balzano G.J., Morse D.J., An Outbreak of Influenza A (H3N2) in a Well Immunized Nursing Home Population, Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 40, pp. 589-592, (1992)
  • [5] Drinka P.J., Gravenstein S., Krause P., Schilling M., Miller B.A., Shult P., Outbreaks of Influenza A and B in a Highly Immunized Nursing Home Population, Journal of Family Practice, 45, pp. 509-514, (1997)
  • [6] Faden R., Beauchamp T.L., A History and Theory of Informed Consent, (1986)
  • [7] Fox J.P., Elveback L., Scott W., Gatewood L., Ackerman E., Herd Immunity: Basic Concept and Relevance to Public Health Immunization Practices. Commentary, Journal of Epidemiology, 94, pp. 179-189, (1971)
  • [8] Govaert Th., Thijs C.T.M.C.N., Masurel N., Sprenger M.J.W., Dinant G.J., Knottnerus J.A., The Efficacy of Influenza vaccination in Elderly Individuals. A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-Controlled Trial, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, pp. 1661-1665, (1994)
  • [9] Gross P.A., Hemogenes A.W., Sacks H.S., Lan J., Levandavski R.A., The Efficacy of Influenza Vaccine in Elderly Persons. A Meta-analysis and Review of the Literature, Annals of Internal Medicine, 123, pp. 518-527, (1995)
  • [10] Gross P.A., Quinnan G.V., Rodstein M., LaMontagne J.R., Kaslow R.A., Saah A.J., Association of Influenza Immunisation With Reduction in Mortality in an Elderly Population. A Prospective Study, Archives of Internal Medicine, 148, pp. 562-565, (1988)