SAFEE: A Debriefing Tool to Identify Latent Conditions in Simulation-based Hospital Design Testing

被引：15

作者：

Colman N. ^{[1
]}

Dalpiaz A. ^{[2
]}

Walter S. ^{[3
]}

Chambers M.S. ^{[4
]}

Hebbar K.B. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, 1405 Clifton Road NE, Division of Critical Care, Atlanta, 30329, GA

[2] Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, 1575 Northeast Expressway, Atlanta, 30329, GA

[3] EYP Architecture and Engineering, 100 Peachtree St NW, Atlanta, 30303, GA

[4] ESa (Earl Swensson Associates), 1033 Demonbreun St., Suite #800, Nashville, 37203, TN

来源：

Advances in Simulation | / 5卷 / 1期

关键词：

Built environment; Debriefing; Healthcare design; Latent conditions; Simulation;

D O I：

10.1186/s41077-020-00132-2

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In the process of hospital planning and design, the ability to mitigate risk is imperative and practical as design decisions made early can lead to unintended downstream effects that may lead to patient harm. Simulation has been applied as a strategy to identify system gaps and safety threats with the goal to mitigate risk and improve patient outcomes. Early in the pre-construction phase of design development for a new free-standing children’s hospital, Simulation-based Hospital Design Testing (SbHDT) was conducted in a full-scale mock-up. This allowed healthcare teams and architects to actively witness care providing an avenue to study the interaction of humans with their environment, enabling effectively identification of latent conditions that may lay dormant in proposed design features. In order to successfully identify latent conditions in the physical environment and understand the impact of those latent conditions, a specific debriefing framework focused on the built environment was developed and implemented. This article provides a rationale for an approach to debriefing that specifically focuses on the built environment and describes SAFEE, a debriefing guide for simulationists looking to conduct SbHDT. © 2020, The Author(s).

引用

共 27 条

[1]

Carayon P., Schoofs Hundt A., Karsh B.T., Gurses A.P., Alvarado C.J., Smith M., Et al., Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model, Qual Saf Health Care, 15, pp. i50-i58, (2006)

[2]

Holden R.J., Carayon P., Gurses A.P., Hoonakker P., Hundt A.S., Ozok A.A., Et al., SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients, Ergonomics., 56, 11, pp. 1669-1686, (2013)

[3]

Dube M.M., Reid J., Kaba A., Cheng A., Eppich W., Grant V., Et al., PEARLS for systems integration: a modified PEARLS framework for debriefing systems-focused simulations, Simul Healthc, (2019)

[4]

Simulation-based mock-up evaluation framework, (2016)

[5]

Ventre K.M., Barry J.S., Davis D., Baiamonte V.L., Wentworth A.C., Pietras M., Et al., Using in situ simulation to evaluate operational readiness of a children's hospital-based obstetrics unit, Simul Healthc, 9, 2, pp. 102-111, (2014)

[6]

Villamaria F.J., Pliego J.F., Wehbe-Janek H., Coker N., Rajab M.H., Sibbitt S., Et al., Using simulation to orient code blue teams to a new hospital facility, Simul Healthc, 3, 4, pp. 209-216, (2008)

[7]

Geis G.L., Pio B., Pendergrass T.L., Moyer M.R., Patterson M.D., Simulation to assess the safety of new healthcare teams and new facilities, Simul Healthc, 6, 3, pp. 125-133, (2011)

[8]

Bender G.J., In situ simulation for systems testing in newly constructed perinatal facilities, Semin Perinatol, 35, 2, pp. 80-83, (2011)

[9]

Bender J., Shields R., Kennally K., Testing with simulation before a big move at Women & Infants Hospital, Med Health R I, 93, 5, (2010)

[10]

Francoeur C., Shea S., Ruddy M., Fontela P., Bhanji F., Razack S., Et al., It takes a village to move a hospital: simulation improves intensive care team preparedness for a move to a new site, Hosp Pediatr, 8, 3, pp. 148-156, (2018)

← 1 2 3 →