Prevalence of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator based on template ECG screening and ineligible surface ECG predicting factors in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in China

被引:0
作者
Lanyan Guo
Minxia Zhang
Miaoyang Hu
Bo Wang
Jing Wang
Lei Zuo
Weiping Yang
Bing Liu
Liwen Liu
机构
[1] The First Affiliated Hospital,Department of Cardiology
[2] Fourth Military Medical University,Department of Ultrasound
[3] The First Affiliated Hospital,undefined
[4] Fourth Military Medical University,undefined
来源
Heart and Vessels | 2019年 / 34卷
关键词
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Subcutaneous ICD; Sudden cardiac death; Screening template; Electrocardiogram;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) may provide comparable protection while avoiding the disadvantage of transvenous lead, but the abnormal features of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) electrocardiogram (ECG) make it a challenge for S-ICD template screening. We aimed to investigate S-ICD eligibility according to the S-ICD manufacturer’s surface ECG screening template in China, and further analyze its corresponding ineligible predicting factors in 12-lead suface ECG. A total of 179 HCM patients (114 males; mean age: 45 ± 14 years) underwent S-ICD screening at rest and on exercise, among which 91 patients (50.8%) were eligible for S-ICD. Among the patients who passed screening, 43 (47.3%) had 3 vectors eligibility; 64 (70.3%) screening qualified on both sides; 10 patients (11.0%) passed the screening while the electrodes located only on the left parasternal line versus 17 patients (18.7%) moved to the right line. The secondary sensing vector (Lead III) was mostly appropriate (53.6%), followed by the primary sensing vector (lead II, 53.1%) and the alternate sensing vector (Lead I, 46.9%). Higher R wave was the major cause, accounted for 70.5%, for screening failure. There existed significant difference in T wave in lead II, aVF, V5 and V6, adds R/T ratio in lead V5 and V6, between the screening success group (group A) and screening failure group (group B) at rest and on exercise. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify that R/T ≤ 3.5 in lead V5 was the independent factor to predict the screening ineligibility, with odds ratio 3.648. S-ICD screening success is 50.8% in HCM patients, which is much lower than that in other studies. R/T ≤ 3.5 in lead V5 in 12-lead surface ECG was an independent predicting factor for screening failure.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 859
页数:8
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [11] Garberich RF(2011)The long-term survival and the risks and benefits of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Heart 98 116-714
  • [12] Udelson JE(2009)Device complications and inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Heart 95 709-499
  • [13] Maron MS(2014)Which patients are not suitable for a subcutaneous ICD: incidence and predictors of failed QRS-T-wave morphology screening J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 25 494-899
  • [14] Rhyner J(2015)Eligibility for the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Cardiovasc Electrohpysiol 26 893-1021
  • [15] Knight PB(2014)How many patients fulfil the surface electrocardiogram criteria for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation? Europace 16 1015-undefined
  • [16] Lambiase PD(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [17] Gold MR(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [18] Hood M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [19] Boersma L(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [20] Theuns DA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined